/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_FirstOrder /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES We consider the system theBenchmark. We are asked to determine termination of the following first-order TRS. !770 : [o * o] --> o !minus : [o * o] --> o 0 : [] --> o gcd : [o * o] --> o if : [o * o * o] --> o s : [o] --> o gcd(X, 0) => X gcd(0, X) => X gcd(s(X), s(Y)) => if(!770(X, Y), gcd(s(X), !minus(Y, X)), gcd(!minus(X, Y), s(Y))) We use the dependency pair framework as described in [Kop12, Ch. 6/7], with static dependency pairs (see [KusIsoSakBla09] and the adaptation for AFSMs in [Kop12, Ch. 7.8]). We thus obtain the following dependency pair problem (P_0, R_0, minimal, formative): Dependency Pairs P_0: 0] gcd#(s(X), s(Y)) =#> gcd#(s(X), !minus(Y, X)) 1] gcd#(s(X), s(Y)) =#> gcd#(!minus(X, Y), s(Y)) Rules R_0: gcd(X, 0) => X gcd(0, X) => X gcd(s(X), s(Y)) => if(!770(X, Y), gcd(s(X), !minus(Y, X)), gcd(!minus(X, Y), s(Y))) Thus, the original system is terminating if (P_0, R_0, minimal, formative) is finite. We consider the dependency pair problem (P_0, R_0, minimal, formative). We place the elements of P in a dependency graph approximation G (see e.g. [Kop12, Thm. 7.27, 7.29], as follows: * 0 : * 1 : This graph has no strongly connected components. By [Kop12, Thm. 7.31], this implies finiteness of the dependency pair problem. As all dependency pair problems were succesfully simplified with sound (and complete) processors until nothing remained, we conclude termination. +++ Citations +++ [Kop12] C. Kop. Higher Order Termination. PhD Thesis, 2012. [KusIsoSakBla09] K. Kusakari, Y. Isogai, M. Sakai, and F. Blanqui. Static Dependency Pair Method Based On Strong Computability for Higher-Order Rewrite Systems. In volume 92(10) of IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems. 2007--2015, 2009.