/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 69 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QTRS (5) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 1 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2nd(cons(X, n__cons(Y, Z))) -> activate(Y) from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(s(X))) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) from(X) -> n__from(X) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) activate(X) -> X Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(2nd(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 POL(activate(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 POL(from(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 POL(n__cons(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(n__from(x_1)) = x_1 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 2nd(cons(X, n__cons(Y, Z))) -> activate(Y) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) from(X) -> n__from(X) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) activate(X) -> X ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(s(X))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 POL(from(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 POL(n__from(x_1)) = x_1 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(s(X))) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES