/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 27 ms] (2) QTRS (3) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a____(__(X, Y), Z) -> a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z))) a____(X, nil) -> mark(X) a____(nil, X) -> mark(X) a__and(tt, X) -> mark(X) a__isList(V) -> a__isNeList(V) a__isList(nil) -> tt a__isList(__(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2)) a__isNeList(V) -> a__isQid(V) a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2)) a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2)) a__isNePal(V) -> a__isQid(V) a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P)) a__isPal(V) -> a__isNePal(V) a__isPal(nil) -> tt a__isQid(a) -> tt a__isQid(e) -> tt a__isQid(i) -> tt a__isQid(o) -> tt a__isQid(u) -> tt mark(__(X1, X2)) -> a____(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) mark(isList(X)) -> a__isList(X) mark(isNeList(X)) -> a__isNeList(X) mark(isQid(X)) -> a__isQid(X) mark(isNePal(X)) -> a__isNePal(X) mark(isPal(X)) -> a__isPal(X) mark(nil) -> nil mark(tt) -> tt mark(a) -> a mark(e) -> e mark(i) -> i mark(o) -> o mark(u) -> u a____(X1, X2) -> __(X1, X2) a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) a__isList(X) -> isList(X) a__isNeList(X) -> isNeList(X) a__isQid(X) -> isQid(X) a__isNePal(X) -> isNePal(X) a__isPal(X) -> isPal(X) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:mark_1 > a > nil > a__and_2 > and_2 > u > o > i > a__isNeList_1 > isNeList_1 > a__isNePal_1 > isNePal_1 > a__isQid_1 > isQid_1 > e > a_____2 > a__isPal_1 > a__isList_1 > isList_1 > ___2 > isPal_1 > tt and weight map: nil=1 tt=3 a=2 e=2 i=2 o=2 u=2 mark_1=0 a__isList_1=3 a__isNeList_1=2 isList_1=3 a__isQid_1=1 isNeList_1=2 a__isNePal_1=2 isPal_1=9 a__isPal_1=9 isQid_1=1 isNePal_1=2 ___2=4 a_____2=4 a__and_2=0 and_2=0 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: a____(__(X, Y), Z) -> a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z))) a____(X, nil) -> mark(X) a____(nil, X) -> mark(X) a__and(tt, X) -> mark(X) a__isList(V) -> a__isNeList(V) a__isList(nil) -> tt a__isList(__(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2)) a__isNeList(V) -> a__isQid(V) a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2)) a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2)) a__isNePal(V) -> a__isQid(V) a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P)) a__isPal(V) -> a__isNePal(V) a__isPal(nil) -> tt a__isQid(a) -> tt a__isQid(e) -> tt a__isQid(i) -> tt a__isQid(o) -> tt a__isQid(u) -> tt mark(__(X1, X2)) -> a____(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) mark(isList(X)) -> a__isList(X) mark(isNeList(X)) -> a__isNeList(X) mark(isQid(X)) -> a__isQid(X) mark(isNePal(X)) -> a__isNePal(X) mark(isPal(X)) -> a__isPal(X) mark(nil) -> nil mark(tt) -> tt mark(a) -> a mark(e) -> e mark(i) -> i mark(o) -> o mark(u) -> u a____(X1, X2) -> __(X1, X2) a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) a__isList(X) -> isList(X) a__isNeList(X) -> isNeList(X) a__isQid(X) -> isQid(X) a__isNePal(X) -> isNePal(X) a__isPal(X) -> isPal(X) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (4) YES