/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 74 ms] (2) QTRS (3) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z)) from(X) -> n__from(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(X) -> X Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Quasi precedence: sel_2 > activate_1 > from_1 > cons_2 sel_2 > activate_1 > from_1 > n__from_1 sel_2 > activate_1 > from_1 > n__s_1 sel_2 > activate_1 > s_1 > n__s_1 Status: from_1: multiset status cons_2: multiset status n__from_1: multiset status n__s_1: multiset status sel_2: [1,2] 0: multiset status s_1: multiset status activate_1: multiset status With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z)) from(X) -> n__from(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(X) -> X ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (4) YES