/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 26 ms] (2) QTRS (3) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X U11(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V2) -> U22(isList(activate(V2))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V2) -> U42(isNeList(activate(V2))) U42(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V2) -> U52(isList(activate(V2))) U52(tt) -> tt U61(tt) -> tt U71(tt, P) -> U72(isPal(activate(P))) U72(tt) -> tt U81(tt) -> tt isList(V) -> U11(isNeList(activate(V))) isList(n__nil) -> tt isList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) isNeList(V) -> U31(isQid(activate(V))) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) isNePal(V) -> U61(isQid(activate(V))) isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) -> U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P)) isPal(V) -> U81(isNePal(activate(V))) isPal(n__nil) -> tt isQid(n__a) -> tt isQid(n__e) -> tt isQid(n__i) -> tt isQid(n__o) -> tt isQid(n__u) -> tt nil -> n__nil __(X1, X2) -> n____(X1, X2) a -> n__a e -> n__e i -> n__i o -> n__o u -> n__u activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n____(X1, X2)) -> __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__a) -> a activate(n__e) -> e activate(n__i) -> i activate(n__o) -> o activate(n__u) -> u activate(X) -> X Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:activate_1 > e > a > n__e > n__a > isNeList_1 > u > o > n__u > n__o > U51_2 > U52_1 > i > ___2 > n__i > isNePal_1 > isQid_1 > U31_1 > n_____2 > U61_1 > nil > n__nil > isPal_1 > U81_1 > U41_2 > U71_2 > U72_1 > isList_1 > U11_1 > tt > U42_1 > U21_2 > U22_1 and weight map: nil=1 tt=8 n__nil=1 n__a=3 n__e=3 n__i=3 n__o=3 n__u=3 a=3 e=3 i=3 o=3 u=3 U11_1=1 U22_1=2 isList_1=7 activate_1=0 U31_1=1 U42_1=2 isNeList_1=6 U52_1=1 U61_1=1 U72_1=5 isPal_1=7 U81_1=1 isQid_1=5 isNePal_1=6 ___2=1 U21_2=1 U41_2=0 U51_2=1 U71_2=4 n_____2=1 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X U11(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V2) -> U22(isList(activate(V2))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V2) -> U42(isNeList(activate(V2))) U42(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V2) -> U52(isList(activate(V2))) U52(tt) -> tt U61(tt) -> tt U71(tt, P) -> U72(isPal(activate(P))) U72(tt) -> tt U81(tt) -> tt isList(V) -> U11(isNeList(activate(V))) isList(n__nil) -> tt isList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) isNeList(V) -> U31(isQid(activate(V))) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) isNePal(V) -> U61(isQid(activate(V))) isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) -> U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P)) isPal(V) -> U81(isNePal(activate(V))) isPal(n__nil) -> tt isQid(n__a) -> tt isQid(n__e) -> tt isQid(n__i) -> tt isQid(n__o) -> tt isQid(n__u) -> tt nil -> n__nil __(X1, X2) -> n____(X1, X2) a -> n__a e -> n__e i -> n__i o -> n__o u -> n__u activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n____(X1, X2)) -> __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__a) -> a activate(n__e) -> e activate(n__i) -> i activate(n__o) -> o activate(n__u) -> u activate(X) -> X ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (4) YES