/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 133 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 16 ms] (4) QTRS (5) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 15 ms] (6) QTRS (7) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) QTRS (9) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) QTRS (11) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(and(tt, X)) -> mark(X) active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> active(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark(tt) -> active(tt) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(0) -> active(0) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(mark(X))) mark(x(X1, X2)) -> active(x(mark(X1), mark(X2))) and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) and(active(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, active(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(active(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, active(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) s(active(X)) -> s(X) x(mark(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) x(active(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, active(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: active/1)YES( and/2(YES,YES) tt/0) mark/1)YES( plus/2(YES,YES) 0/0) s/1(YES) x/2(YES,YES) Quasi precedence: [0, x_2] > plus_2 > s_1 Status: and_2: multiset status tt: multiset status plus_2: multiset status 0: multiset status s_1: multiset status x_2: multiset status With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: active(and(tt, X)) -> mark(X) active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: mark(and(X1, X2)) -> active(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark(tt) -> active(tt) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(0) -> active(0) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(mark(X))) mark(x(X1, X2)) -> active(x(mark(X1), mark(X2))) and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) and(active(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, active(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(active(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, active(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) s(active(X)) -> s(X) x(mark(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) x(active(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, active(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 2 POL(active(x_1)) = 2 + x_1 POL(and(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + 2*x_1 + 2*x_2 POL(mark(x_1)) = 2*x_1 POL(plus(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + 2*x_1 + 2*x_2 POL(s(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 POL(tt) = 2 POL(x(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + 2*x_1 + x_2 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: and(active(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, active(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(active(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, active(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(active(X)) -> s(X) x(active(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, active(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: mark(and(X1, X2)) -> active(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark(tt) -> active(tt) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(0) -> active(0) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(mark(X))) mark(x(X1, X2)) -> active(x(mark(X1), mark(X2))) and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) x(mark(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 1 POL(active(x_1)) = x_1 POL(and(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(mark(x_1)) = 2*x_1 POL(plus(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + 2*x_1 + x_2 POL(s(x_1)) = 2*x_1 POL(tt) = 1 POL(x(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + 2*x_1 + 2*x_2 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: mark(tt) -> active(tt) mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(0) -> active(0) mark(x(X1, X2)) -> active(x(mark(X1), mark(X2))) ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: mark(and(X1, X2)) -> active(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(mark(X))) and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) x(mark(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(active(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(and(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + 2*x_1 + 2*x_2 POL(mark(x_1)) = 2*x_1 POL(plus(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(s(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 POL(x(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + 2*x_2 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: mark(and(X1, X2)) -> active(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(mark(X))) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) x(mark(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (9) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:mark_1 > x_2 > s_1 > plus_2 > and_2 and weight map: mark_1=0 s_1=1 and_2=0 plus_2=0 x_2=0 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> plus(X1, X2) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus(X1, X2) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) x(mark(X1), X2) -> x(X1, X2) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> x(X1, X2) ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (11) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (12) YES