/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSToCSRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) CSR (3) CSDependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QCSDP (5) QCSDependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) AND (7) QCSDP (8) QCSDPReductionPairProof [EQUIVALENT, 122 ms] (9) QCSDP (10) QCSDependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (11) TRUE (12) QCSDP (13) QCSDPSubtermProof [EQUIVALENT, 4 ms] (14) QCSDP (15) QCSDependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) TRUE (17) QCSDP (18) QCSDPSubtermProof [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms] (19) QCSDP (20) QCSDependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (21) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(U11(tt, N)) -> mark(N) active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) active(U31(tt)) -> mark(0) active(U41(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) active(and(tt, X)) -> mark(X) active(isNat(0)) -> mark(tt) active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) -> mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))) active(isNat(s(V1))) -> mark(isNat(V1)) active(isNat(x(V1, V2))) -> mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))) active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(U11(isNat(N), N)) active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)) active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(U31(isNat(N))) active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)) active(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(active(X1), X2) active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) active(U31(X)) -> U31(active(X)) active(U41(X1, X2, X3)) -> U41(active(X1), X2, X3) active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) active(and(X1, X2)) -> and(active(X1), X2) U11(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(U11(X1, X2)) U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) U31(mark(X)) -> mark(U31(X)) U41(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) and(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(and(X1, X2)) proper(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(tt) -> ok(tt) proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(U31(X)) -> U31(proper(X)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(U41(X1, X2, X3)) -> U41(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(and(X1, X2)) -> and(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(isNat(X)) -> isNat(proper(X)) U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2)) U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) U31(ok(X)) -> ok(U31(X)) U41(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U41(X1, X2, X3)) x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(and(X1, X2)) isNat(ok(X)) -> ok(isNat(X)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSToCSRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(U11(tt, N)) -> mark(N) active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) active(U31(tt)) -> mark(0) active(U41(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) active(and(tt, X)) -> mark(X) active(isNat(0)) -> mark(tt) active(isNat(plus(V1, V2))) -> mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))) active(isNat(s(V1))) -> mark(isNat(V1)) active(isNat(x(V1, V2))) -> mark(and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2))) active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(U11(isNat(N), N)) active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)) active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(U31(isNat(N))) active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)) active(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(active(X1), X2) active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) active(U31(X)) -> U31(active(X)) active(U41(X1, X2, X3)) -> U41(active(X1), X2, X3) active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) active(and(X1, X2)) -> and(active(X1), X2) U11(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(U11(X1, X2)) U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) U31(mark(X)) -> mark(U31(X)) U41(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) and(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(and(X1, X2)) proper(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(tt) -> ok(tt) proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(U31(X)) -> U31(proper(X)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(U41(X1, X2, X3)) -> U41(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(and(X1, X2)) -> and(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(isNat(X)) -> isNat(proper(X)) U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2)) U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) U31(ok(X)) -> ok(U31(X)) U41(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U41(X1, X2, X3)) x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(and(X1, X2)) isNat(ok(X)) -> ok(isNat(X)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) Q is empty. Special symbols used for the transformation (see [GM04]): top: top_1, active: active_1, mark: mark_1, ok: ok_1, proper: proper_1 The replacement map contains the following entries: U11: {1} tt: empty set U21: {1} s: {1} plus: {1, 2} U31: {1} 0: empty set U41: {1} x: {1, 2} and: {1} isNat: empty set The QTRS contained all rules created by the complete Giesl-Middeldorp transformation. Therefore, the inverse transformation is complete (and sound). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) The replacement map contains the following entries: U11: {1} tt: empty set U21: {1} s: {1} plus: {1, 2} U31: {1} 0: empty set U41: {1} x: {1, 2} and: {1} isNat: empty set ---------------------------------------- (3) CSDependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Improved CS-DPs [LPAR08] we result in the following initial Q-CSDP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2, PLUS_2, X_2, U31'_1} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, U21'_3, U41'_3, AND_2, U11'_2} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1, ISNAT_1, U_1} are not replacing on any position. The ordinary context-sensitive dependency pairs DP_o are: U21'(tt, M, N) -> PLUS(N, M) U41'(tt, M, N) -> PLUS(x(N, M), N) U41'(tt, M, N) -> X(N, M) ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) -> AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) -> ISNAT(V1) ISNAT(s(V1)) -> ISNAT(V1) ISNAT(x(V1, V2)) -> AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) ISNAT(x(V1, V2)) -> ISNAT(V1) PLUS(N, 0) -> U11'(isNat(N), N) PLUS(N, 0) -> ISNAT(N) PLUS(N, s(M)) -> U21'(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) PLUS(N, s(M)) -> AND(isNat(M), isNat(N)) PLUS(N, s(M)) -> ISNAT(M) X(N, 0) -> U31'(isNat(N)) X(N, 0) -> ISNAT(N) X(N, s(M)) -> U41'(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) X(N, s(M)) -> AND(isNat(M), isNat(N)) X(N, s(M)) -> ISNAT(M) The collapsing dependency pairs are DP_c: U11'(tt, N) -> N U21'(tt, M, N) -> N U21'(tt, M, N) -> M U41'(tt, M, N) -> N U41'(tt, M, N) -> M AND(tt, X) -> X The hidden terms of R are: isNat(x0) Every hiding context is built from:none Hence, the new unhiding pairs DP_u are : U11'(tt, N) -> U(N) U21'(tt, M, N) -> U(N) U21'(tt, M, N) -> U(M) U41'(tt, M, N) -> U(N) U41'(tt, M, N) -> U(M) AND(tt, X) -> U(X) U(isNat(x0)) -> ISNAT(x0) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) QCSDependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Context-Sensitive Dependency Graph [LPAR08] contains 3 SCCs with 14 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (6) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (7) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, AND_2} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1, U_1, ISNAT_1} are not replacing on any position. The TRS P consists of the following rules: AND(tt, X) -> U(X) U(isNat(x0)) -> ISNAT(x0) ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) -> AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) -> ISNAT(V1) ISNAT(s(V1)) -> ISNAT(V1) ISNAT(x(V1, V2)) -> AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) ISNAT(x(V1, V2)) -> ISNAT(V1) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (8) QCSDPReductionPairProof (EQUIVALENT) Using the order AND/2)NO,YES( tt/0) U/1)YES( isNat/1(YES) ISNAT/1(YES) plus/2(YES,YES) s/1(YES) x/2(YES,YES) 0/0) and/2)NO,YES( U11/2(YES,YES) U21/3(YES,YES,YES) U31/1(NO) U41/3(YES,YES,YES) Quasi precedence: [x_2, 0, U31, U41_3] > tt > [plus_2, U21_3] > s_1 > [isNat_1, ISNAT_1] > U11_2 Status: tt: multiset status isNat_1: multiset status ISNAT_1: multiset status plus_2: [1,2] s_1: [1] x_2: [2,1] 0: multiset status U11_2: [1,2] U21_3: [3,2,1] U31: [] U41_3: [2,3,1] the following usable rules isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) and(tt, X) -> X x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) could all be oriented weakly. Furthermore, the pairs ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) -> AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) -> ISNAT(V1) ISNAT(s(V1)) -> ISNAT(V1) ISNAT(x(V1, V2)) -> AND(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) ISNAT(x(V1, V2)) -> ISNAT(V1) could be oriented strictly and thus removed by the CS-Reduction Pair Processor [LPAR08,DA_EMMES]. ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, AND_2} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1, U_1, ISNAT_1} are not replacing on any position. The TRS P consists of the following rules: AND(tt, X) -> U(X) U(isNat(x0)) -> ISNAT(x0) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (10) QCSDependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Context-Sensitive Dependency Graph [LPAR08] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (11) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2, PLUS_2} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, U21'_3} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1} are not replacing on any position. The TRS P consists of the following rules: PLUS(N, s(M)) -> U21'(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) U21'(tt, M, N) -> PLUS(N, M) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (13) QCSDPSubtermProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the subterm processor [DA_EMMES]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. PLUS(N, s(M)) -> U21'(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. U21'(tt, M, N) -> PLUS(N, M) Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order. U21'(x1, x2, x3) = x2 PLUS(x1, x2) = x2 Subterm Order ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2, PLUS_2} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, U21'_3} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1} are not replacing on any position. The TRS P consists of the following rules: U21'(tt, M, N) -> PLUS(N, M) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (15) QCSDependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Context-Sensitive Dependency Graph [LPAR08] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (16) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (17) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2, X_2} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, U41'_3} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1} are not replacing on any position. The TRS P consists of the following rules: U41'(tt, M, N) -> X(N, M) X(N, s(M)) -> U41'(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (18) QCSDPSubtermProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the subterm processor [DA_EMMES]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. X(N, s(M)) -> U41'(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. U41'(tt, M, N) -> X(N, M) Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order. X(x1, x2) = x2 U41'(x1, x2, x3) = x2 Subterm Order ---------------------------------------- (19) Obligation: Q-restricted context-sensitive dependency pair problem: The symbols in {s_1, plus_2, U31_1, x_2, X_2} are replacing on all positions. For all symbols f in {U11_2, U21_3, U41_3, and_2, U41'_3} we have mu(f) = {1}. The symbols in {isNat_1} are not replacing on any position. The TRS P consists of the following rules: U41'(tt, M, N) -> X(N, M) The TRS R consists of the following rules: U11(tt, N) -> N U21(tt, M, N) -> s(plus(N, M)) U31(tt) -> 0 U41(tt, M, N) -> plus(x(N, M), N) and(tt, X) -> X isNat(0) -> tt isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) isNat(s(V1)) -> isNat(V1) isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> and(isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) plus(N, 0) -> U11(isNat(N), N) plus(N, s(M)) -> U21(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) x(N, 0) -> U31(isNat(N)) x(N, s(M)) -> U41(and(isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (20) QCSDependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Context-Sensitive Dependency Graph [LPAR08] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (21) TRUE