/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven:

(0) RelTRS
(1) RootLabelingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) RelTRS
(3) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 87 ms]
(4) RelTRS
(5) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 4 ms]
(6) RelTRS
(7) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

   f(g(f(x))) -> f(g(g(g(f(x)))))

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   g(x) -> g(g(x))


----------------------------------------

(1) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT)
We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic:
LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled


----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

   f_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{f_1}(x))) -> f_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{f_1}(x)))))
   f_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{g_1}(x))) -> f_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{g_1}(x)))))

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   g_{f_1}(x) -> g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(x))
   g_{g_1}(x) -> g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(x))


----------------------------------------

(3) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal:
Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) :

   <<<
 POL(f_{g_1}(x_1)) =  	[[0], [0]] 	 +  	[[2, 2], [2, 2]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

   <<<
 POL(g_{f_1}(x_1)) =  	[[0], [0]] 	 +  	[[2, 2], [2, 2]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

   <<<
 POL(f_{f_1}(x_1)) =  	[[2], [2]] 	 +  	[[1, 0], [0, 0]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

   <<<
 POL(g_{g_1}(x_1)) =  	[[0], [0]] 	 +  	[[1, 0], [0, 0]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly:
Rules from R:

   f_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{f_1}(x))) -> f_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{f_1}(x)))))
Rules from S:
none




----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

   f_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{g_1}(x))) -> f_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{g_1}(x)))))

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   g_{f_1}(x) -> g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(x))
   g_{g_1}(x) -> g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(x))


----------------------------------------

(5) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal:
Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) :

   <<<
 POL(f_{g_1}(x_1)) =  	[[0], [0]] 	 +  	[[2, 2], [0, 0]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

   <<<
 POL(g_{f_1}(x_1)) =  	[[2], [2]] 	 +  	[[1, 0], [0, 0]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

   <<<
 POL(g_{g_1}(x_1)) =  	[[0], [0]] 	 +  	[[1, 0], [0, 0]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly:
Rules from R:

   f_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{g_1}(x))) -> f_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(f_{g_1}(x)))))
Rules from S:
none




----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
R is empty.
The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   g_{f_1}(x) -> g_{g_1}(g_{f_1}(x))
   g_{g_1}(x) -> g_{g_1}(g_{g_1}(x))


----------------------------------------

(7) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
----------------------------------------

(8)
YES