/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: (0) RelTRS (1) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 19 ms] (2) RelTRS (3) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 31 ms] (4) RelTRS (5) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: top(ok(new(x))) -> top(check(x)) top(ok(old(x))) -> top(check(x)) The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: bot -> new(bot) check(new(x)) -> new(check(x)) check(old(x)) -> old(check(x)) check(old(x)) -> ok(old(x)) new(ok(x)) -> ok(new(x)) old(ok(x)) -> ok(old(x)) ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(bot) = 0 POL(check(x_1)) = x_1 POL(new(x_1)) = x_1 POL(ok(x_1)) = x_1 POL(old(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(top(x_1)) = x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: Rules from R: top(ok(old(x))) -> top(check(x)) Rules from S: none ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: top(ok(new(x))) -> top(check(x)) The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: bot -> new(bot) check(new(x)) -> new(check(x)) check(old(x)) -> old(check(x)) check(old(x)) -> ok(old(x)) new(ok(x)) -> ok(new(x)) old(ok(x)) -> ok(old(x)) ---------------------------------------- (3) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : <<< POL(top(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[2, 2], [0, 0]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(ok(x_1)) = [[2], [2]] + [[2, 0], [0, 1]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(new(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 2]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(check(x_1)) = [[2], [0]] + [[2, 0], [0, 2]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(bot) = [[0], [0]] >>> <<< POL(old(x_1)) = [[0], [2]] + [[1, 0], [1, 0]] * x_1 >>> With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: Rules from R: top(ok(new(x))) -> top(check(x)) Rules from S: none ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: R is empty. The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: bot -> new(bot) check(new(x)) -> new(check(x)) check(old(x)) -> old(check(x)) check(old(x)) -> ok(old(x)) new(ok(x)) -> ok(new(x)) old(ok(x)) -> ok(old(x)) ---------------------------------------- (5) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES