/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could be proven: (0) CTRS (1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 50 ms] (4) QTRS (5) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QTRS (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Conditional term rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a -> c b -> c The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules: f(x) -> x <= a -> x ---------------------------------------- (1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND) The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x) -> U1(a, x) U1(x, x) -> x a -> c b -> c Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(U1(x_1, x_2)) = 2*x_1 + 2*x_2 POL(a) = 1 POL(b) = 2 POL(c) = 1 POL(f(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: b -> c ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x) -> U1(a, x) U1(x, x) -> x a -> c Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:f_1 > a > c > U1_2 and weight map: a=2 c=2 f_1=2 U1_2=0 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: f(x) -> U1(a, x) U1(x, x) -> x a -> c ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (8) YES