/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given CSR could be proven: (0) CSR (1) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 62 ms] (2) CSR (3) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) CSR (5) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) CSR (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X and(tt, X) -> X isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> tt The replacement map contains the following entries: __: {1, 2} nil: empty set and: {1} tt: empty set isNePal: {1} ---------------------------------------- (1) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X and(tt, X) -> X isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> tt The replacement map contains the following entries: __: {1, 2} nil: empty set and: {1} tt: empty set isNePal: {1} Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(__(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(and(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(isNePal(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(nil) = 0 POL(tt) = 1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: and(tt, X) -> X ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> tt The replacement map contains the following entries: __: {1, 2} nil: empty set tt: empty set isNePal: {1} ---------------------------------------- (3) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> tt The replacement map contains the following entries: __: {1, 2} nil: empty set tt: empty set isNePal: {1} Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : <<< POL(__(x_1, x_2)) = [[1], [0]] + [[1, 1], [1, 1]] * x_1 + [[1, 0], [0, 1]] * x_2 >>> <<< POL(nil) = [[1], [1]] >>> <<< POL(isNePal(x_1)) = [[1], [1]] + [[1, 1], [1, 1]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(tt) = [[0], [1]] >>> With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) -> tt ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) The replacement map contains the following entries: __: {1, 2} ---------------------------------------- (5) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) The replacement map contains the following entries: __: {1, 2} Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(__(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + 2*x_1 + x_2 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: R is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The CSR R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (8) YES