/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NO

Not SN because in (2-2) with V'|-> V', U|-> U, V|-> V'
a subterm of the rhs is matched with its lhs using forward closure of the rules.

******** Signature ********
 0 : d
 f : a -> a
 g : (((b,d) -> e),b,e) -> f
 s : c -> e
******** Computation Rules ********
 (1)  f(X) => X
 (2)  g(Z,U,s(V)) => g(Z,U,Z[U,0])

NO