/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES ******** General Schema criterion ******** Found constructors: 0, cons, false, nil, s, true Checking type order >>OK Checking positivity of constructors >>OK Checking function dependency >>Regared as equal: filter2, filter Checking (1) p(0) => 0 (fun p>0) >>True Checking (2) p(s(X)) => X (meta X)[is acc in s(X)] [is positive in s(X)] [is acc in X] >>True Checking (3) le(0,Y) => true (fun le>true) >>True Checking (4) le(s(U),0) => false (fun le>false) >>True Checking (5) le(s(V),s(W)) => le(V,W) (fun le=le) subterm comparison of args w. LR LR (meta V)[is acc in s(V),s(W)] [is positive in s(V)] [is acc in V] (meta W)[is acc in s(V),s(W)] [is positive in s(V)] [is positive in s(W)] [is acc in W] >>True Checking (6) minus(P,X1) => if(le(P,X1),P,X1) (fun minus>if) (fun minus>le) (meta P)[is acc in P,X1] [is acc in P] (meta X1)[is acc in P,X1] [is acc in X1] (meta P)[is acc in P,X1] [is acc in P] (meta X1)[is acc in P,X1] [is acc in X1] >>True Checking (7) if(true,Y1,U1) => 0 (fun if>0) >>True Checking (8) if(false,V1,W1) => s(minus(p(V1),W1)) (fun if>s) (fun if>minus) (fun if>p) (meta V1)[is acc in false,V1,W1] [is positive in false] [is acc in V1] (meta W1)[is acc in false,V1,W1] [is positive in false] [is acc in W1] >>True Checking (9) map(J1,nil) => nil (fun map>nil) >>True Checking (10) map(F2,cons(Y2,U2)) => cons(F2[Y2],map(F2,U2)) (fun map>cons) (meta F2)[is acc in F2,cons(Y2,U2)] [is acc in F2] (meta Y2)[is acc in F2,cons(Y2,U2)] [is positive in cons(Y2,U2)] [is acc in Y2] (fun map=map) subterm comparison of args w. LR LR (meta F2)[is acc in F2,cons(Y2,U2)] [is acc in F2] (meta U2)[is acc in F2,cons(Y2,U2)] [is positive in cons(Y2,U2)] [is acc in U2] >>True Checking (11) filter(H2,nil) => nil (fun filter>nil) >>True Checking (12) filter(I2,cons(P2,X3)) => filter2(I2[P2],I2,P2,X3) (fun filter=filter2) subterm comparison of args w. Arg [1,2] Arg [2,4,3,1] (meta I2)[is acc in I2,cons(P2,X3)] [is acc in I2] (meta P2)[is acc in I2,cons(P2,X3)] [is positive in cons(P2,X3)] [is acc in P2] (meta I2)[is acc in I2,cons(P2,X3)] [is acc in I2] (meta P2)[is acc in I2,cons(P2,X3)] [is positive in cons(P2,X3)] [is acc in P2] (meta X3)[is acc in I2,cons(P2,X3)] [is positive in cons(P2,X3)] [is acc in X3] >>True Checking (13) filter2(true,Z3,U3,V3) => cons(U3,filter(Z3,V3)) (fun filter2>cons) (meta U3)[is acc in true,Z3,U3,V3] [is positive in true] [is acc in U3] (fun filter2=filter) subterm comparison of args w. Arg [2,4,3,1] Arg [1,2] (meta Z3)[is acc in true,Z3,U3,V3] [is positive in true] [is acc in Z3] (meta V3)[is acc in true,Z3,U3,V3] [is positive in true] [is acc in V3] >>True Checking (14) filter2(false,I3,P3,X4) => filter(I3,X4) (fun filter2=filter) subterm comparison of args w. Arg [2,4,3,1] Arg [1,2] (meta I3)[is acc in false,I3,P3,X4] [is positive in false] [is acc in I3] (meta X4)[is acc in false,I3,P3,X4] [is positive in false] [is acc in X4] >>True #SN! ******** Signature ******** 0 : b cons : (c,d) -> d false : a filter : ((c -> a),d) -> d filter2 : (a,(c -> a),c,d) -> d if : (a,b,b) -> b le : (b,b) -> a map : ((c -> c),d) -> d minus : (b,b) -> b nil : d p : b -> b s : b -> b true : a ******** Computation Rules ******** (1) p(0) => 0 (2) p(s(X)) => X (3) le(0,Y) => true (4) le(s(U),0) => false (5) le(s(V),s(W)) => le(V,W) (6) minus(P,X1) => if(le(P,X1),P,X1) (7) if(true,Y1,U1) => 0 (8) if(false,V1,W1) => s(minus(p(V1),W1)) (9) map(J1,nil) => nil (10) map(F2,cons(Y2,U2)) => cons(F2[Y2],map(F2,U2)) (11) filter(H2,nil) => nil (12) filter(I2,cons(P2,X3)) => filter2(I2[P2],I2,P2,X3) (13) filter2(true,Z3,U3,V3) => cons(U3,filter(Z3,V3)) (14) filter2(false,I3,P3,X4) => filter(I3,X4) YES