/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO We split firstr-order part and higher-order part, and do modular checking by a general modularity. ******** FO SN check ******** Check non-SN using NTI (Non-Termination Inference by Payet) ******** Computation rules ******** (1) f(s(X)) => f(g(X,X)) (2) g(0,1) => s(0) (3) 0 => 1 forward+backward process killed -- 7 rule(s) generated NO let R be the TRS under consideration f(s(_1)) -> f(g(_1,_1)) is in elim_R(R) let l0 be the left-hand side of this rule p0 = 0 is a position in l0 we have l0|p0 = s(_1) g(0,1) -> s(0) is in R let r'0 be the right-hand side of this rule theta0 = {_1/0} is a mgu of l0|p0 and r'0 ==> f(g(0,1)) -> f(g(0,0)) is in EU_R^1 let l1 be the left-hand side of this rule p1 = 0.1 is a position in l1 we have l1|p1 = 1 0 -> 1 is in R let r'1 be the right-hand side of this rule theta1 = {} is a mgu of l1|p1 and r'1 ==> f(g(0,0)) -> f(g(0,0)) is in EU_R^2 let l be the left-hand side and r be the right-hand side of this rule let p = epsilon let theta = {} let theta' = {} we have r|p = f(g(0,0)) and theta'(theta(l)) = theta(r|p) so, theta(l) = f(g(0,0)) is non-terminating w.r.t. R Termination disproved by the backward process proof stopped at iteration i=2, depth k=2 4 rule(s) generated >>NO ******** Signature ******** 0 : b 1 : b cons : (e,f) -> f f : c -> a false : d filter : ((e -> d),f) -> f filter2 : (d,(e -> d),e,f) -> f g : (b,b) -> c map : ((e -> e),f) -> f nil : f s : b -> c true : d ******** Computation Rules ******** (1) f(s(X)) => f(g(X,X)) (2) g(0,1) => s(0) (3) 0 => 1 (4) map(Z,nil) => nil (5) map(G,cons(V,W)) => cons(G[V],map(G,W)) (6) filter(J,nil) => nil (7) filter(F1,cons(Y1,U1)) => filter2(F1[Y1],F1,Y1,U1) (8) filter2(true,H1,W1,P1) => cons(W1,filter(H1,P1)) (9) filter2(false,F2,Y2,U2) => filter(F2,U2) NO