/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_c /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given C Problem could be proven: (0) C Problem (1) CToLLVMProof [EQUIVALENT, 180 ms] (2) LLVM problem (3) LLVMToTerminationGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 1597 ms] (4) LLVM Symbolic Execution Graph (5) SymbolicExecutionGraphToSCCProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (6) LLVM Symbolic Execution SCC (7) SCC2IRS [SOUND, 75 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) IntTRS (11) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 13 ms] (12) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: c file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c ---------------------------------------- (1) CToLLVMProof (EQUIVALENT) Compiled c-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c to LLVM. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: LLVM Problem Aliases: Data layout: "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" Machine: "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" Type definitions: Global variables: Function declarations and definitions: *BasicFunctionTypename: "__VERIFIER_nondet_int" returnParam: i32 parameters: () variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc *BasicFunctionTypename: "test_fun" linkageType: EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE returnParam: i32 parameters: (x i32, y i32, z i32) variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc 0: %1 = alloca i32, align 4 %2 = alloca i32, align 4 %3 = alloca i32, align 4 %c = alloca i32, align 4 store %x, %1 store %y, %2 store %z, %3 store 0, %c br %4 4: %5 = load %1 %6 = load %2 %7 = icmp eq %5 %6 br %7, %8, %12 8: %9 = load %1 %10 = load %3 %11 = icmp sgt %9 %10 br %12 12: %13 = phi [0, %4], [%11, %8] br %13, %14, %27 14: br %15 15: %16 = load %2 %17 = load %3 %18 = icmp sgt %16 %17 br %18, %19, %26 19: %20 = load %1 %21 = sub %20 1 store %21, %1 %22 = load %2 %23 = sub %22 1 store %23, %2 %24 = load %c %25 = add %24 1 store %25, %c br %15 26: br %4 27: %28 = load %c ret %28 *BasicFunctionTypename: "main" linkageType: EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE returnParam: i32 parameters: () variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc 0: %1 = alloca i32, align 4 store 0, %1 %2 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() %3 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() %4 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() %5 = call i32 @test_fun(i32 %2, i32 %3, i32 %4) ret %5 Analyze Termination of all function calls matching the pattern: main() ---------------------------------------- (3) LLVMToTerminationGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed symbolic execution graph for LLVM program and proved memory safety. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: SE Graph ---------------------------------------- (5) SymbolicExecutionGraphToSCCProof (SOUND) Splitted symbolic execution graph to 1 SCC. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: SCC ---------------------------------------- (7) SCC2IRS (SOUND) Transformed LLVM symbolic execution graph SCC into a rewrite problem. Log: Generated rules. Obtained 16 rulesP rules: f_330(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_331(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_331(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_332(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: v196 < v203 f_332(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_334(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_334(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_336(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_336(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_338(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_338(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_340(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 1 + v213 = v203 f_340(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_342(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_342(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_344(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_344(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_346(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 1 + v213 = v203 f_346(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_348(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_348(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_350(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_350(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_352(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4, 2) :|: v216 = 1 + v205 && 2 <= v216 f_352(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4, 2) -> f_354(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4, 2) :|: TRUE f_354(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4, 2) -> f_356(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4, 2) :|: TRUE f_356(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4, 2) -> f_329(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v213, v205, v216, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_329(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v202, v203, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) -> f_330(v195, v196, v197, v198, v199, v200, 1, v203, v202, v204, v205, v206, v207, v208, v209, v210, v211, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 Combined rules. Obtained 1 rulesP rules: f_330(v195:0, v196:0, v197:0, v198:0, v199:0, v200:0, 1, 1 + v213:0, v202:0, v204:0, v205:0, v206:0, v207:0, v208:0, v209:0, v210:0, v211:0, 0, 3, 4) -> f_330(v195:0, v196:0, v197:0, v198:0, v199:0, v200:0, 1, v213:0, 1 + v213:0, v205:0, 1 + v205:0, v206:0, v207:0, v208:0, v209:0, v210:0, v211:0, 0, 3, 4) :|: v205:0 > 0 && v196:0 < 1 + v213:0 Filtered unneeded arguments: f_330(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11, x12, x13, x14, x15, x16, x17, x18, x19, x20) -> f_330(x2, x8, x11) Removed division, modulo operations, cleaned up constraints. Obtained 1 rules.P rules: f_330(v196:0, sum~cons_1~v213:0, v205:0) -> f_330(v196:0, v213:0, 1 + v205:0) :|: v205:0 > 0 && v196:0 < 1 + v213:0 && sum~cons_1~v213:0 = 1 + v213:0 ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f_330(v196:0, sum~cons_1~v213:0, v205:0) -> f_330(v196:0, v213:0, 1 + v205:0) :|: v205:0 > 0 && v196:0 < 1 + v213:0 && sum~cons_1~v213:0 = 1 + v213:0 ---------------------------------------- (9) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Rules: f_330(v196:0:0, sum~cons_1~v213:0:0, v205:0:0) -> f_330(v196:0:0, v213:0:0, 1 + v205:0:0) :|: v205:0:0 > 0 && v196:0:0 < 1 + v213:0:0 && sum~cons_1~v213:0:0 = 1 + v213:0:0 ---------------------------------------- (11) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f_330(x, x1, x2)] = -x + x1 The following rules are decreasing: f_330(v196:0:0, sum~cons_1~v213:0:0, v205:0:0) -> f_330(v196:0:0, v213:0:0, 1 + v205:0:0) :|: v205:0:0 > 0 && v196:0:0 < 1 + v213:0:0 && sum~cons_1~v213:0:0 = 1 + v213:0:0 The following rules are bounded: f_330(v196:0:0, sum~cons_1~v213:0:0, v205:0:0) -> f_330(v196:0:0, v213:0:0, 1 + v205:0:0) :|: v205:0:0 > 0 && v196:0:0 < 1 + v213:0:0 && sum~cons_1~v213:0:0 = 1 + v213:0:0 ---------------------------------------- (12) YES