/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_c /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given C Problem could be proven: (0) C Problem (1) CToLLVMProof [EQUIVALENT, 179 ms] (2) LLVM problem (3) LLVMToTerminationGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 700 ms] (4) LLVM Symbolic Execution Graph (5) SymbolicExecutionGraphToSCCProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (6) LLVM Symbolic Execution SCC (7) SCC2IRS [SOUND, 57 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) IRS2T2 [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) T2IntSys (11) T2 [EQUIVALENT, 1015 ms] (12) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: c file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c ---------------------------------------- (1) CToLLVMProof (EQUIVALENT) Compiled c-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c to LLVM. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: LLVM Problem Aliases: Data layout: "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" Machine: "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" Type definitions: Global variables: Function declarations and definitions: *BasicFunctionTypename: "__VERIFIER_nondet_int" returnParam: i32 parameters: () variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc *BasicFunctionTypename: "main" linkageType: EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE returnParam: i32 parameters: () variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc 0: %1 = alloca i32, align 4 %x = alloca i32, align 4 %y = alloca i32, align 4 store 0, %1 %2 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() store %2, %x %3 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() store %3, %y %4 = load %y %5 = icmp slt %4 1 br %5, %6, %7 6: store 0, %1 br %21 7: br %8 8: %9 = load %x %10 = icmp sge %9 0 br %10, %11, %20 11: %12 = load %x %13 = load %y %14 = sub %12 %13 store %14, %x %15 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() store %15, %y %16 = load %y %17 = icmp slt %16 1 br %17, %18, %19 18: br %20 19: br %8 20: store 0, %1 br %21 21: %22 = load %1 ret %22 Analyze Termination of all function calls matching the pattern: main() ---------------------------------------- (3) LLVMToTerminationGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed symbolic execution graph for LLVM program and proved memory safety. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: SE Graph ---------------------------------------- (5) SymbolicExecutionGraphToSCCProof (SOUND) Splitted symbolic execution graph to 1 SCC. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: SCC ---------------------------------------- (7) SCC2IRS (SOUND) Transformed LLVM symbolic execution graph SCC into a rewrite problem. Log: Generated rules. Obtained 16 rulesP rules: f_173(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_174(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 <= v59 && 1 <= v56 f_174(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_176(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_176(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_178(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_178(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_180(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_180(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_182(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_182(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_184(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: v79 + v60 = v59 f_184(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_186(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_186(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_187(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_187(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_188(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_188(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_189(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_189(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_191(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 1 <= v81 f_191(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_193(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_193(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_195(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_195(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_197(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_197(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_172(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v60, v79, v81, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_172(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v56, 1, v58, v59, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) -> f_173(v50, v51, v52, v53, v54, 0, v59, 1, v56, v58, v60, v61, v62, v63, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 Combined rules. Obtained 1 rulesP rules: f_173(v50:0, v51:0, v52:0, v53:0, v54:0, 0, v79:0 + v60:0, 1, v56:0, v58:0, v60:0, v61:0, v62:0, v63:0, 3, 4) -> f_173(v50:0, v51:0, v52:0, v53:0, v54:0, 0, v79:0, 1, v79:0 + v60:0, v60:0, v81:0, v61:0, v62:0, v63:0, 3, 4) :|: v56:0 > 0 && v81:0 > 0 && v79:0 + v60:0 > -1 Filtered unneeded arguments: f_173(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11, x12, x13, x14, x15, x16) -> f_173(x7, x9, x11) Removed division, modulo operations, cleaned up constraints. Obtained 1 rules.P rules: f_173(sum~v79:0~v60:0, v56:0, v60:0) -> f_173(v79:0, v79:0 + v60:0, v81:0) :|: v81:0 > 0 && v79:0 + v60:0 > -1 && v56:0 > 0 && sum~v79:0~v60:0 = v79:0 + v60:0 ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f_173(sum~v79:0~v60:0, v56:0, v60:0) -> f_173(v79:0, v79:0 + v60:0, v81:0) :|: v81:0 > 0 && v79:0 + v60:0 > -1 && v56:0 > 0 && sum~v79:0~v60:0 = v79:0 + v60:0 ---------------------------------------- (9) IRS2T2 (EQUIVALENT) Transformed input IRS into an integer transition system.Used the following mapping from defined symbols to location IDs: (f_173_3,1) ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: START: 0; FROM: 0; TO: 1; FROM: 1; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := x1; oldX2 := x2; oldX3 := oldX0 - oldX2; oldX4 := nondet(); assume(oldX4 > 0 && oldX3 + oldX2 > -1 && oldX1 > 0 && oldX0 = oldX3 + oldX2); x0 := oldX0 - oldX2; x1 := oldX3 + oldX2; x2 := oldX4; TO: 1; ---------------------------------------- (11) T2 (EQUIVALENT) No proof given by T2 ---------------------------------------- (12) YES