/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_c /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given C Problem could be proven: (0) C Problem (1) CToLLVMProof [EQUIVALENT, 178 ms] (2) LLVM problem (3) LLVMToTerminationGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 1195 ms] (4) LLVM Symbolic Execution Graph (5) SymbolicExecutionGraphToSCCProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (6) AND (7) LLVM Symbolic Execution SCC (8) SCC2IRS [SOUND, 41 ms] (9) IntTRS (10) IRS2T2 [EQUIVALENT, 1 ms] (11) T2IntSys (12) T2 [EQUIVALENT, 773 ms] (13) YES (14) LLVM Symbolic Execution SCC (15) SCC2IRS [SOUND, 51 ms] (16) IntTRS (17) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) IntTRS (19) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 12 ms] (20) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: c file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c ---------------------------------------- (1) CToLLVMProof (EQUIVALENT) Compiled c-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c to LLVM. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: LLVM Problem Aliases: Data layout: "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" Machine: "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" Type definitions: Global variables: Function declarations and definitions: *BasicFunctionTypename: "__VERIFIER_nondet_int" returnParam: i32 parameters: () variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc *BasicFunctionTypename: "main" linkageType: EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE returnParam: i32 parameters: () variableLength: false visibilityType: DEFAULT callingConvention: ccc 0: %1 = alloca i32, align 4 %N = alloca i32, align 4 %j = alloca i32, align 4 %i = alloca i32, align 4 store 0, %1 %2 = call i32 @__VERIFIER_nondet_int() store %2, %N %3 = load %N store %3, %i br %4 4: %5 = load %i %6 = icmp sgt %5 0 br %6, %7, %18 7: %8 = load %N store %8, %j br %9 9: %10 = load %j %11 = icmp sgt %10 0 br %11, %12, %15 12: %13 = load %j %14 = add %13 -1 store %14, %j br %9 15: %16 = load %i %17 = add %16 -1 store %17, %i br %4 18: ret 0 Analyze Termination of all function calls matching the pattern: main() ---------------------------------------- (3) LLVMToTerminationGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed symbolic execution graph for LLVM program and proved memory safety. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: SE Graph ---------------------------------------- (5) SymbolicExecutionGraphToSCCProof (SOUND) Splitted symbolic execution graph to 2 SCCs. ---------------------------------------- (6) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (7) Obligation: SCC ---------------------------------------- (8) SCC2IRS (SOUND) Transformed LLVM symbolic execution graph SCC into a rewrite problem. Log: Generated rules. Obtained 28 rulesP rules: f_211(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v240, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_212(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 1 + v247 = v238 && 0 <= v247 f_212(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_213(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_213(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_214(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_214(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_215(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_215(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_216(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 < v247 && 2 <= v238 f_215(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_217(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: v247 <= 0 && v238 = 1 && v247 = 0 && 0 = 0 f_216(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_218(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_218(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_220(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_220(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_210(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v247, v238, v247, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_210(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v239, v240, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_211(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, v238, v240, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_217(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_219(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_219(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_221(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_221(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v241, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_222(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_222(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_223(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v297, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 1 + v297 = v236 && 0 <= v297 f_223(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v297, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_224(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v297, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_224(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v297, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_225(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v297, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_225(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v236, 1, 0, v297, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_226(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_226(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_227(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 < v297 && 2 <= v236 && 3 <= v235 f_227(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_229(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_229(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_231(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_231(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_233(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_233(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_234(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_234(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_235(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_235(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) -> f_236(v231, v232, v233, v234, v235, v297, 1, 0, v236, v242, v243, v244, v245, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_236(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) -> f_237(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_237(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) -> f_238(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_238(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) -> f_239(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_239(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 3, 2, 4) -> f_210(v327, v328, v329, v330, v331, v332, 1, v331, 1, 0, v335, v336, v337, v338, v339, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE Combined rules. Obtained 2 rulesP rules: f_211(v231:0, v232:0, v233:0, v234:0, v235:0, v236:0, 1, 1 + v247:0, v240:0, v241:0, v242:0, v243:0, v244:0, v245:0, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_211(v231:0, v232:0, v233:0, v234:0, v235:0, v236:0, 1, v247:0, v247:0, v241:0, v242:0, v243:0, v244:0, v245:0, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: v247:0 > 0 f_211(v231:0, v232:0, v233:0, v234:0, v235:0, 1 + v297:0, 1, 1, v240:0, v241:0, v242:0, v243:0, v244:0, v245:0, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_211(v231:0, v232:0, v233:0, v234:0, v235:0, v297:0, 1, v235:0, 0, 1 + v297:0, v242:0, v243:0, v244:0, v245:0, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: v297:0 > 0 && v235:0 > 2 Filtered unneeded arguments: f_211(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11, x12, x13, x14, x15, x16, x17, x18) -> f_211(x5, x6, x8) Removed division, modulo operations, cleaned up constraints. Obtained 2 rules.P rules: f_211(v235:0, v236:0, sum~cons_1~v247:0) -> f_211(v235:0, v236:0, v247:0) :|: v247:0 > 0 && sum~cons_1~v247:0 = 1 + v247:0 f_211(v235:0, sum~cons_1~v297:0, cons_1) -> f_211(v235:0, v297:0, v235:0) :|: v297:0 > 0 && v235:0 > 2 && sum~cons_1~v297:0 = 1 + v297:0 && cons_1 = 1 ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Rules: f_211(v235:0, v236:0, sum~cons_1~v247:0) -> f_211(v235:0, v236:0, v247:0) :|: v247:0 > 0 && sum~cons_1~v247:0 = 1 + v247:0 f_211(x, x1, x2) -> f_211(x, x3, x) :|: x3 > 0 && x > 2 && x1 = 1 + x3 && x2 = 1 ---------------------------------------- (10) IRS2T2 (EQUIVALENT) Transformed input IRS into an integer transition system.Used the following mapping from defined symbols to location IDs: (f_211_3,1) ---------------------------------------- (11) Obligation: START: 0; FROM: 0; TO: 1; FROM: 1; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := x1; oldX2 := x2; oldX3 := oldX2 - 1; assume(oldX3 > 0 && oldX2 = 1 + oldX3); x0 := oldX0; x1 := oldX1; x2 := oldX2 - 1; TO: 1; FROM: 1; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := x1; oldX2 := x2; oldX3 := oldX1 - 1; assume(oldX3 > 0 && oldX0 > 2 && oldX1 = 1 + oldX3 && oldX2 = 1); x0 := oldX0; x1 := oldX1 - 1; x2 := oldX0; TO: 1; ---------------------------------------- (12) T2 (EQUIVALENT) Initially, performed program simplifications using lexicographic rank functions: * Removed transitions 1, 4, 5 using the following rank functions: - Rank function 1: RF for loc. 5: x1 RF for loc. 6: x1 Bound for (chained) transitions 5: 2 - Rank function 2: RF for loc. 5: 1+2*x2 RF for loc. 6: 2*x2 Bound for (chained) transitions 4: 4 - Rank function 3: RF for loc. 5: 1 RF for loc. 6: 0 Bound for (chained) transitions 1: 1 ---------------------------------------- (13) YES ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: SCC ---------------------------------------- (15) SCC2IRS (SOUND) Transformed LLVM symbolic execution graph SCC into a rewrite problem. Log: Generated rules. Obtained 9 rulesP rules: f_145(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 4) -> f_146(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 < v41 && 2 <= v40 && 2 <= v38 f_146(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_148(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_148(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_150(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_150(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_152(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 0 = 0 f_152(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_154(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: 1 + v47 = v41 && 0 <= v47 f_154(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_156(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_156(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_158(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) :|: TRUE f_158(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 2, 4) -> f_144(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v47, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 4) :|: TRUE f_144(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v40, v41, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 4) -> f_145(v34, v35, v36, v37, v38, 1, v41, v40, v42, v43, v44, v45, 0, 3, 4) :|: 0 = 0 Combined rules. Obtained 1 rulesP rules: f_145(v34:0, v35:0, v36:0, v37:0, v38:0, 1, 1 + v47:0, v40:0, v42:0, v43:0, v44:0, v45:0, 0, 3, 4) -> f_145(v34:0, v35:0, v36:0, v37:0, v38:0, 1, v47:0, 1 + v47:0, v42:0, v43:0, v44:0, v45:0, 0, 3, 4) :|: v40:0 > 1 && v47:0 > -1 && v38:0 > 1 Filtered unneeded arguments: f_145(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11, x12, x13, x14, x15) -> f_145(x5, x7, x8) Removed division, modulo operations, cleaned up constraints. Obtained 1 rules.P rules: f_145(v38:0, sum~cons_1~v47:0, v40:0) -> f_145(v38:0, v47:0, 1 + v47:0) :|: v47:0 > -1 && v38:0 > 1 && v40:0 > 1 && sum~cons_1~v47:0 = 1 + v47:0 ---------------------------------------- (16) Obligation: Rules: f_145(v38:0, sum~cons_1~v47:0, v40:0) -> f_145(v38:0, v47:0, 1 + v47:0) :|: v47:0 > -1 && v38:0 > 1 && v40:0 > 1 && sum~cons_1~v47:0 = 1 + v47:0 ---------------------------------------- (17) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (18) Obligation: Rules: f_145(v38:0:0, sum~cons_1~v47:0:0, v40:0:0) -> f_145(v38:0:0, v47:0:0, 1 + v47:0:0) :|: v47:0:0 > -1 && v38:0:0 > 1 && v40:0:0 > 1 && sum~cons_1~v47:0:0 = 1 + v47:0:0 ---------------------------------------- (19) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f_145(x, x1, x2)] = x1 The following rules are decreasing: f_145(v38:0:0, sum~cons_1~v47:0:0, v40:0:0) -> f_145(v38:0:0, v47:0:0, 1 + v47:0:0) :|: v47:0:0 > -1 && v38:0:0 > 1 && v40:0:0 > 1 && sum~cons_1~v47:0:0 = 1 + v47:0:0 The following rules are bounded: f_145(v38:0:0, sum~cons_1~v47:0:0, v40:0:0) -> f_145(v38:0:0, v47:0:0, 1 + v47:0:0) :|: v47:0:0 > -1 && v38:0:0 > 1 && v40:0:0 > 1 && sum~cons_1~v47:0:0 = 1 + v47:0:0 ---------------------------------------- (20) YES