/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_c /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given C Problem could be proven: (0) C Problem (1) CToIRSProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IntTRS (3) TerminationGraphProcessor [SOUND, 38 ms] (4) IntTRS (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 36 ms] (6) IntTRS (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: c file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c ---------------------------------------- (1) CToIRSProof (EQUIVALENT) Parsed C Integer Program as IRS. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1(x, y, tmp) -> f2(x_1, y, tmp) :|: TRUE f2(x1, x2, x3) -> f3(x1, x4, x3) :|: TRUE f3(x5, x6, x7) -> f4(x5, x6, x8) :|: TRUE f5(x9, x10, x11) -> f6(x9, x10, x9) :|: TRUE f6(x12, x13, x14) -> f7(x13, x13, x14) :|: TRUE f7(x15, x16, x17) -> f8(x15, x17, x17) :|: TRUE f4(x18, x19, x20) -> f5(x18, x19, x20) :|: x18 > x19 f8(x21, x22, x23) -> f4(x21, x22, x23) :|: TRUE f4(x24, x25, x26) -> f9(x24, x25, x26) :|: x24 <= x25 Start term: f1(x, y, tmp) ---------------------------------------- (3) TerminationGraphProcessor (SOUND) Constructed the termination graph and obtained one non-trivial SCC. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Rules: f4(x18, x19, x20) -> f5(x18, x19, x20) :|: x18 > x19 f8(x21, x22, x23) -> f4(x21, x22, x23) :|: TRUE f7(x15, x16, x17) -> f8(x15, x17, x17) :|: TRUE f6(x12, x13, x14) -> f7(x13, x13, x14) :|: TRUE f5(x9, x10, x11) -> f6(x9, x10, x9) :|: TRUE ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: f6(x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) -> f6(x13:0, x14:0, x13:0) :|: x14:0 < x13:0 ---------------------------------------- (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: f6(x1, x2, x3) -> f6(x2, x3) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f6(x13:0, x14:0) -> f6(x14:0, x13:0) :|: x14:0 < x13:0 ---------------------------------------- (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f6(x, x1)] = -1 + x - x1 The following rules are decreasing: f6(x13:0, x14:0) -> f6(x14:0, x13:0) :|: x14:0 < x13:0 The following rules are bounded: f6(x13:0, x14:0) -> f6(x14:0, x13:0) :|: x14:0 < x13:0 ---------------------------------------- (10) YES