/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_termcomp17 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES Solver Timeout: 4 Global Timeout: 300 Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900 ******************************************************************************************* *********************** UNPROCESSED TRANSITION SYSTEMS PER FUNCTION *********************** ******************************************************************************************* List of LLVMGraphs + assumeNodes + staticAssertNodes [1] : +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + Init Location: 0 Transitions: 0, main_x -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int), main_y -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int), main_z -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> = 0))> = 0)> (main_x + main_y)}> (main_x + main_z)}> (main_y + main_z), main_z -> (main_z - 1)}> 0}> Fresh variables: Undef variables: Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: Accepting locations: Asserts: + Assume Nodes [0]: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Static Assert Nodes [0]: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + After preprocess (paralelization): ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Init Location: 0 Transitions: 0}> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> varCall_1}> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> varCall_2}> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> varCall_3}> = 0)> = 0))> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> (main_x + main_y)}> (main_x + main_z)}> (main_y + main_z), main_z -> (main_z - 1)}> 0}> Fresh variables: Undef variables: Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: 11, Accepting locations: Asserts: + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Function Return and Parameters Information [2 functions]: function name: __VERIFIER_nondet_int [1 return + 0 parameters] demangled: __VERIFIER_nondet_int __VERIFIER_nondet_int__func_return_ [function result] : int function name: main [1 return + 0 parameters] demangled: main main__func_return_ [function result] : int AST Ident Scanner Information [5 idents]: __VERIFIER_nondet_int | function | [integer, ()] | | main | function | [integer, ()] | x | local variable | integer | | y | local variable | integer | | z | local variable | integer | | Main function: main Preprocessed LLVMGraph Init Location: 0 Transitions: = 0) /\ (undef8 = 0), par{main_x -> (main_x + main_z), main_y -> (main_y + main_z), main_z -> (main_z - 1)}> = 0) /\ (undef8 = 1), par{main_x -> (main_x + main_y), main_y -> (main_y + main_z), main_z -> (main_z - 1)}> = 0))> Fresh variables: undef5, undef6, undef7, undef8, Undef variables: undef5, undef6, undef7, undef8, Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: 11, Accepting locations: Asserts: ************************************************************* ******************************************************************************************* *********************** WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG) *********************** ******************************************************************************************* Init Location: 0 Graph 0: Transitions: Variables: Graph 1: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Graph 2: Transitions: Variables: Precedence: Graph 0 Graph 1 Graph 2 Map Locations to Subgraph: ( 0 , 0 ) ( 2 , 1 ) ( 11 , 2 ) ******************************************************************************************* ******************************** CHECKING ASSERTIONS ******************************** ******************************************************************************************* Proving termination of subgraph 0 Proving termination of subgraph 1 Checking unfeasibility... Time used: 0.004372 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001175s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003195s [60050 : 60051] [60050 : 60052] Successful child: 60051 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... > It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> New Graphs: LOG: CALL check - Post:1 + main_x <= 0 - Process 1 * Exit transition: * Postcondition : 1 + main_x <= 0 LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000584s > Postcondition is not implied! LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000679s INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: 1 + main_x <= 0 , Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001090s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003417s [60050 : 60056] [60050 : 60057] Successful child: 60056 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: main_x New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000717s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002698s [60050 : 60064] [60050 : 60065] Successful child: 60064 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: main_x New Graphs: [60050 : 60097] [60050 : 60098] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: main_x + main_z <= 0 , 1 + main_x + main_y <= 0 , LOG: CALL check - Post:1 + main_z <= 0 - Process 2 * Exit transition: * Postcondition : 1 + main_z <= 0 LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000826s > Postcondition is not implied! LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000929s INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: 1 + main_z <= 0 , Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004281s Ranking function: main_z New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002161s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.020876s [60050 : 60105] [60050 : 60106] Successful child: 60105 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... > It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001347s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.005949s [60050 : 60224] [60050 : 60225] Successful child: 60224 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> New Graphs: [60050 : 60229] [60050 : 60230] [60050 : 60231] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: main_x + main_y <= 0 , main_x + main_z <= 0 , INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: 1 + main_x + main_y <= 0 , It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.005846s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.230724s [60050 : 60232] [60050 : 60233] Successful child: 60232 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: 3 + 2*main_y - 3*main_z New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003425s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.042331s Piecewise ranking function: min(3 + 2*main_x + 2*main_z,0) New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002348s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.080379s [60050 : 60237] [60050 : 60238] Successful child: 60238 Ranking function: 2*main_x - 2*main_z Ranking function and negation of Quasi-Invariant applied New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001846s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.025737s [60050 : 60242] [60050 : 60243] Successful child: 60242 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: main_x + main_y New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001042s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004627s [60050 : 60247] [60050 : 60248] Successful child: 60247 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... > It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> New Graphs: [60050 : 60252] [60050 : 60253] [60050 : 60254] [60050 : 60255] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: 2 + main_z <= 0 , [60050 : 60256] [60050 : 60257] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: main_y <= 2 , [60050 : 60258] [60050 : 60259] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: main_x + main_y <= 0 , Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 3 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.008147s Ranking function: 1 + main_z New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002588s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.039873s [60050 : 60260] [60050 : 60261] Successful child: 60260 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: 2 + 2*main_x + main_y + main_z New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002824s Ranking function: (~(1) / 2) + (1 / 2)*main_x + (1 / 2)*main_y New Graphs: [60050 : 60265] [60050 : 60266] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: main_y <= 0 , main_z <= 0 , It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.008988s Ranking function: -3 + 3*main_z New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002936s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.033595s [60050 : 60267] [60050 : 60268] Successful child: 60267 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: 2 - main_x + 2*main_y - main_z New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003847s Ranking function: -1 + main_y New Graphs: [60050 : 60272] [60050 : 60273] [60050 : 60274] [60050 : 60275] INVARIANTS: 2: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: 1 + main_z <= 0 , It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 It's unfeasible. Removing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 Narrowing transition: main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 1 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.007476s Ranking function: -3*main_y New Graphs: Transitions: main_x + main_z, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> main_x + main_y, main_y -> main_y + main_z, main_z -> -1 + main_z, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_x, main_y, main_z Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002960s Ranking function: main_z New Graphs: Proving termination of subgraph 2 Analyzing SCC {l11}... No cycles found. Program Terminates