/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_termcomp17 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.smt2 /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO Solver Timeout: 4 Global Timeout: 300 Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900 No parsing errors! Init Location: 0 Transitions: (1 + walker^0)}> (~(1) + walker^0)}> undef22, i^0 -> (0 + undef26), pos^0 -> 0, seq^0 -> undef26, walker^0 -> 1, z^0 -> undef28}> (0 + undef33), seq^0 -> undef33, z^0 -> undef35}> (~(1) + i^0)}> (~(1) + z^0)}> undef65}> Fresh variables: undef22, undef26, undef28, undef33, undef35, undef65, Undef variables: undef22, undef26, undef28, undef33, undef35, undef65, Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: Accepting locations: Asserts: Preprocessed LLVMGraph Init Location: 0 Transitions: (1 + walker^0), z^0 -> (~(1) + z^0)}> (~(1) + walker^0), z^0 -> (~(1) + z^0)}> (0 + undef33), seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> (1 + walker^0), z^0 -> undef35}> (0 + undef33), seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> (~(1) + walker^0), z^0 -> undef35}> (~(1) + i^0), walker^0 -> (~(1) + walker^0)}> Fresh variables: undef22, undef26, undef28, undef33, undef35, undef65, Undef variables: undef22, undef26, undef28, undef33, undef35, undef65, Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: Accepting locations: Asserts: ************************************************************* ******************************************************************************************* *********************** WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG) *********************** ******************************************************************************************* Init Location: 0 Graph 0: Transitions: Variables: Graph 1: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, walker^0, z^0, i^0, seq^0 Graph 2: Transitions: Variables: Precedence: Graph 0 Graph 1 Graph 2 Map Locations to Subgraph: ( 0 , 0 ) ( 2 , 2 ) ( 4 , 1 ) ******************************************************************************************* ******************************** CHECKING ASSERTIONS ******************************** ******************************************************************************************* Proving termination of subgraph 0 Proving termination of subgraph 1 Checking unfeasibility... Time used: 0.052484 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004944s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.130958s [12933 : 13004] [12933 : 13005] Successful child: 13004 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... > It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> New Graphs: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, i^0, walker^0, z^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003382s Ranking function: -4 + 4*z^0 New Graphs: Transitions: -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, i^0, walker^0, z^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001372s Ranking function: -1 + i^0 New Graphs: LOG: CALL check - Post:walker^0 + z^0 <= i^0 - Process 1 * Exit transition: * Postcondition : walker^0 + z^0 <= i^0 LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001158s > Postcondition is not implied! LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.001308s INVARIANTS: 4: Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 4: walker^0 + z^0 <= i^0 , 0 <= z^0 , Narrowing transition: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 Narrowing transition: -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: Narrow transition size 2 invGraph after Narrowing: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, walker^0, z^0, i^0, seq^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.008626s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.805677s [12933 : 14634] [12933 : 14635] Successful child: 14634 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... > It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility It's unfeasible. Removing transition: -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> New Graphs: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, i^0, seq^0, walker^0, z^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004992s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.180398s [12933 : 14931] [12933 : 14932] Solving with 1 template(s). LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.240288s Time used: 0.235758 Improving Solution with cost 1 ... LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 1.001008s Time used: 1.00093 LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 1.241296s Cost: 1; Total time: 1.23669 Termination implied by a set of invariant(s): Invariant at l4: 0 <= 1 + N^0 + walker^0 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Quasi-ranking function: 50000 - seq^0 New Graphs: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, i^0, seq^0, walker^0, z^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.006022s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 2.003877s [12933 : 17358] [12933 : 17360] Solving with 1 template(s). LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.247522s Time used: 0.24008 Improving Solution with cost 1 ... LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 1.001251s Time used: 1.00116 LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 1.248773s Cost: 1; Total time: 1.24124 Termination implied by a set of invariant(s): Invariant at l4: 1 <= N^0 + walker^0 + z^0 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Quasi-ranking function: 50000 + 50000*N^0 - seq^0 New Graphs: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, i^0, seq^0, walker^0, z^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.009751s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 2.006623s [12933 : 19793] [12933 : 19794] Solving with 1 template(s). LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.240100s Time used: 0.234774 Improving Solution with cost 1 ... LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 1.001883s Time used: 1.00178 LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 1.241984s Cost: 1; Total time: 1.23655 Termination implied by a set of invariant(s): Invariant at l4: 1 <= seq^0 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Quasi-ranking function: 50000 - N^0 - seq^0 New Graphs: Transitions: 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> -1 + z^0, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> 1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> undef33, seq^0 -> undef33, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, z^0 -> undef35, rest remain the same}> -1 + i^0, walker^0 -> -1 + walker^0, rest remain the same}> Variables: N^0, i^0, seq^0, walker^0, z^0 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.008219s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 2.016519s [12933 : 22339] [12933 : 22340] Solving with 1 template(s). LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 4.109659s Time used: 4.10256 [12933 : 25034] [12933 : 25074] Successful child: 25034 Program does NOT terminate