/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 217 ms] (2) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: f2(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f2(A, -(1) + B, C)) :|: 29 >= A f2(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f300(A, -(1) + B, C)) :|: A >= 30 f300(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f2(A, B, C)) :|: 19 >= B f300(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f1(A, B, D)) :|: B >= 20 f3(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f300(A, B, C)) :|: TRUE The start-symbols are:[f3_3] ---------------------------------------- (1) Loat Proof (FINISHED) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: f3 0: f2 -> f2 : B'=-1+B, [ 29>=A ], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f300 : B'=-1+B, [ A>=30 ], cost: 1 2: f300 -> f2 : [ 19>=B ], cost: 1 3: f300 -> f1 : C'=free, [ B>=20 ], cost: 1 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 Removed unreachable and leaf rules: Start location: f3 0: f2 -> f2 : B'=-1+B, [ 29>=A ], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f300 : B'=-1+B, [ A>=30 ], cost: 1 2: f300 -> f2 : [ 19>=B ], cost: 1 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Accelerating simple loops of location 0. Accelerating the following rules: 0: f2 -> f2 : B'=-1+B, [ 29>=A ], cost: 1 Accelerated rule 0 with NONTERM, yielding the new rule 5. Removing the simple loops: 0. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: f3 1: f2 -> f300 : B'=-1+B, [ A>=30 ], cost: 1 5: f2 -> [4] : [ 29>=A ], cost: INF 2: f300 -> f2 : [ 19>=B ], cost: 1 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: f3 1: f2 -> f300 : B'=-1+B, [ A>=30 ], cost: 1 2: f300 -> f2 : [ 19>=B ], cost: 1 6: f300 -> [4] : [ 19>=B && 29>=A ], cost: INF 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 Eliminated locations (on linear paths): Start location: f3 6: f300 -> [4] : [ 19>=B && 29>=A ], cost: INF 7: f300 -> f300 : B'=-1+B, [ 19>=B && A>=30 ], cost: 2 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Accelerating the following rules: 7: f300 -> f300 : B'=-1+B, [ 19>=B && A>=30 ], cost: 2 Accelerated rule 7 with NONTERM, yielding the new rule 8. Removing the simple loops: 7. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: f3 6: f300 -> [4] : [ 19>=B && 29>=A ], cost: INF 8: f300 -> [5] : [ 19>=B && A>=30 ], cost: INF 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: f3 6: f300 -> [4] : [ 19>=B && 29>=A ], cost: INF 4: f3 -> f300 : [], cost: 1 9: f3 -> [5] : [ 19>=B && A>=30 ], cost: INF Eliminated locations (on linear paths): Start location: f3 9: f3 -> [5] : [ 19>=B && A>=30 ], cost: INF 10: f3 -> [4] : [ 19>=B && 29>=A ], cost: INF ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: f3 9: f3 -> [5] : [ 19>=B && A>=30 ], cost: INF 10: f3 -> [4] : [ 19>=B && 29>=A ], cost: INF Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 9 Resulting cost INF has complexity: Nonterm Found new complexity Nonterm. Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Nonterm Cpx degree: Nonterm Solved cost: INF Rule cost: INF Rule guard: [ 19>=B && A>=30 ] NO ---------------------------------------- (2) BOUNDS(INF, INF)