/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?, O(1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 44 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, 1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: f0(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f8(D, 0, C)) :|: TRUE f8(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f8(A, B + 1, C)) :|: 9 >= B f19(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f19(A, B, C + 1)) :|: 9 >= C f19(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f29(A, B, C)) :|: C >= 10 f8(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f19(A, B, 0)) :|: B >= 10 The start-symbols are:[f0_3] ---------------------------------------- (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) YES(?, 25) Initial complexity problem: 1: T: (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(d, 0, ar_2)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 9 >= ar_1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 9 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f29(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 10 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_1 >= 10 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 2: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(d, 0, ar_2)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 9 >= ar_1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 9 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f29(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 10 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_1 >= 10 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(f0) = 2 Pol(f8) = 2 Pol(f19) = 1 Pol(f29) = 0 Pol(koat_start) = 2 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_1 >= 10 ] f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f29(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 10 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 3: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(d, 0, ar_2)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 9 >= ar_1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 9 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f29(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 10 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_1 >= 10 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(f0) = 10 Pol(f8) = -V_2 + 10 Pol(f19) = -V_2 Pol(f29) = -V_2 Pol(koat_start) = 10 orients all transitions weakly and the transition f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 9 >= ar_1 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 4: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(d, 0, ar_2)) (Comp: 10, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 9 >= ar_1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 9 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f29(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 10 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_1 >= 10 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(f0) = 10 Pol(f8) = 10 Pol(f19) = -V_3 + 10 Pol(f29) = -V_3 Pol(koat_start) = 10 orients all transitions weakly and the transition f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 9 >= ar_2 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 5: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(d, 0, ar_2)) (Comp: 10, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 9 >= ar_1 ] (Comp: 10, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 9 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f19(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f29(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 10 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f19(ar_0, ar_1, 0)) [ ar_1 >= 10 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Complexity upper bound 25 Time: 0.081 sec (SMT: 0.074 sec) ---------------------------------------- (2) BOUNDS(1, 1)