/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?, O(1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 19 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, 1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: f0(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f9(0, D, 0)) :|: TRUE f9(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f9(A, B, C + 1)) :|: 49 >= C f17(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f17(A + 1, B, C)) :|: 49 >= A f17(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f24(A, B, C)) :|: A >= 50 f9(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f17(0, B, C)) :|: C >= 50 The start-symbols are:[f0_3] ---------------------------------------- (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) YES(?, 105) Initial complexity problem: 1: T: (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(0, d, 0)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 49 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 49 >= ar_0 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 50 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 50 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 2: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(0, d, 0)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 49 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 49 >= ar_0 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 50 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 50 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(f0) = 2 Pol(f9) = 2 Pol(f17) = 1 Pol(f24) = 0 Pol(koat_start) = 2 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 50 ] f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 50 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 3: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(0, d, 0)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 49 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 49 >= ar_0 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 50 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 50 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(f0) = 50 Pol(f9) = -V_3 + 50 Pol(f17) = -V_3 Pol(f24) = -V_3 Pol(koat_start) = 50 orients all transitions weakly and the transition f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 49 >= ar_2 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 4: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(0, d, 0)) (Comp: 50, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 49 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 49 >= ar_0 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 50 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 50 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(f0) = 50 Pol(f9) = 50 Pol(f17) = -V_1 + 50 Pol(f24) = -V_1 Pol(koat_start) = 50 orients all transitions weakly and the transition f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 49 >= ar_0 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 5: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(0, d, 0)) (Comp: 50, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1)) [ 49 >= ar_2 ] (Comp: 50, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 49 >= ar_0 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f17(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f24(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 50 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f9(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f17(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 50 ] (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Complexity upper bound 105 Time: 0.095 sec (SMT: 0.089 sec) ---------------------------------------- (2) BOUNDS(1, 1)