/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_c_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.c /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 85 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: eval_foo_start(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_i, v_j, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.01 < v_M eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.02 < v_N eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.01 >= v_M && v_.02 >= v_N eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01 + 1, v_.02 + 1, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.01, v_.02, v_M, v_N, v_a, v_b, v_c, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_9] ---------------------------------------- (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) YES(?, 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_4 + 2*ar_3 + 2*ar_5 + 10) Initial complexity problem: 1: T: (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 2: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(evalfoostart) = 2 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = 2 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = 2 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = 2 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = 1 Pol(evalfoostop) = 0 Pol(koat_start) = 2 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 3: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(evalfoostart) = -V_2 + V_5 + 1 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = -V_2 + V_5 + 1 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = -V_1 + V_5 + 1 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = -V_1 + V_5 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = -V_1 + V_5 Pol(evalfoostop) = -V_1 + V_5 Pol(koat_start) = -V_2 + V_5 + 1 orients all transitions weakly and the transition evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 4: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ar_1 + ar_4 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 A polynomial rank function with Pol(evalfoostart) = -V_4 + V_6 + 1 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = -V_4 + V_6 + 1 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = -V_3 + V_6 + 1 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = -V_3 + V_6 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = -V_3 + V_6 Pol(evalfoostop) = -V_3 + V_6 Pol(koat_start) = -V_4 + V_6 + 1 orients all transitions weakly and the transition evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] strictly and produces the following problem: 5: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ar_1 + ar_4 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ar_3 + ar_5 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 5 produces the following problem: 6: T: (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: ar_1 + ar_4 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_0 + 1 ] (Comp: ar_3 + ar_5 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_5 >= ar_2 + 1 ] (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_4 /\ ar_2 >= ar_5 ] (Comp: ar_3 + ar_5 + ar_1 + ar_4 + 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] start location: koat_start leaf cost: 0 Complexity upper bound 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_4 + 2*ar_3 + 2*ar_5 + 10 Time: 0.100 sec (SMT: 0.083 sec) ---------------------------------------- (2) BOUNDS(1, n^1)