/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u()) +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z)) - Signature: {+/2} / {*/2,u/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {*,u} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u()) +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z)) - Signature: {+/2} / {*/2,u/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {*,u} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. *_0(1,1) -> 1 *_0(1,3) -> 1 *_0(3,1) -> 1 *_0(3,3) -> 1 *_1(1,4) -> 2 *_1(1,4) -> 4 *_1(3,4) -> 2 *_1(3,4) -> 4 +_0(1,1) -> 2 +_0(1,3) -> 2 +_0(3,1) -> 2 +_0(3,3) -> 2 +_1(1,1) -> 4 +_1(1,3) -> 4 +_1(3,1) -> 4 +_1(3,3) -> 4 u_0() -> 3 * Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) -> *(x,+(y,z)) +(*(x,y),+(*(x,z),u())) -> +(*(x,+(y,z)),u()) +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z)) - Signature: {+/2} / {*/2,u/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {*,u} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))