/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,Cons(x',xs)) -> f[Ite][False][Ite](lt0(x,Cons(Nil(),Nil())),x,Cons(x',xs)) f(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) g(x,Cons(x',xs)) -> g[Ite][False][Ite](lt0(x,Cons(Nil(),Nil())),x,Cons(x',xs)) g(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) goal(x,y) -> Cons(f(x,y),Cons(g(x,y),Nil())) lt0(x,Nil()) -> False() lt0(Cons(x',xs'),Cons(x,xs)) -> lt0(xs',xs) lt0(Nil(),Cons(x',xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Cons(x,xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Nil()) -> False() number4(n) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) - Weak TRS: f[Ite][False][Ite](False(),Cons(x,xs),y) -> f(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) f[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> f(x',xs) g[Ite][False][Ite](False(),Cons(x,xs),y) -> g(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) g[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> g(x',xs) - Signature: {f/2,f[Ite][False][Ite]/3,g/2,g[Ite][False][Ite]/3,goal/2,lt0/2,notEmpty/1,number4/1} / {Cons/2,False/0 ,Nil/0,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,f[Ite][False][Ite],g,g[Ite][False][Ite],goal,lt0 ,notEmpty,number4} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,Cons(x',xs)) -> f[Ite][False][Ite](lt0(x,Cons(Nil(),Nil())),x,Cons(x',xs)) f(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) g(x,Cons(x',xs)) -> g[Ite][False][Ite](lt0(x,Cons(Nil(),Nil())),x,Cons(x',xs)) g(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) goal(x,y) -> Cons(f(x,y),Cons(g(x,y),Nil())) lt0(x,Nil()) -> False() lt0(Cons(x',xs'),Cons(x,xs)) -> lt0(xs',xs) lt0(Nil(),Cons(x',xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Cons(x,xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Nil()) -> False() number4(n) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) - Weak TRS: f[Ite][False][Ite](False(),Cons(x,xs),y) -> f(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) f[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> f(x',xs) g[Ite][False][Ite](False(),Cons(x,xs),y) -> g(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) g[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> g(x',xs) - Signature: {f/2,f[Ite][False][Ite]/3,g/2,g[Ite][False][Ite]/3,goal/2,lt0/2,notEmpty/1,number4/1} / {Cons/2,False/0 ,Nil/0,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,f[Ite][False][Ite],g,g[Ite][False][Ite],goal,lt0 ,notEmpty,number4} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: lt0(y,u){y -> Cons(x,y),u -> Cons(z,u)} = lt0(Cons(x,y),Cons(z,u)) ->^+ lt0(y,u) = C[lt0(y,u) = lt0(y,u){}] ** Step 1.b:1: Ara WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,Cons(x',xs)) -> f[Ite][False][Ite](lt0(x,Cons(Nil(),Nil())),x,Cons(x',xs)) f(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) g(x,Cons(x',xs)) -> g[Ite][False][Ite](lt0(x,Cons(Nil(),Nil())),x,Cons(x',xs)) g(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) goal(x,y) -> Cons(f(x,y),Cons(g(x,y),Nil())) lt0(x,Nil()) -> False() lt0(Cons(x',xs'),Cons(x,xs)) -> lt0(xs',xs) lt0(Nil(),Cons(x',xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Cons(x,xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Nil()) -> False() number4(n) -> Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Cons(Nil(),Nil())))) - Weak TRS: f[Ite][False][Ite](False(),Cons(x,xs),y) -> f(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) f[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> f(x',xs) g[Ite][False][Ite](False(),Cons(x,xs),y) -> g(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) g[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> g(x',xs) - Signature: {f/2,f[Ite][False][Ite]/3,g/2,g[Ite][False][Ite]/3,goal/2,lt0/2,notEmpty/1,number4/1} / {Cons/2,False/0 ,Nil/0,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,f[Ite][False][Ite],g,g[Ite][False][Ite],goal,lt0 ,notEmpty,number4} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: Ara {araHeuristics = NoHeuristics, minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 2, araTimeout = 5, araRuleShifting = Nothing} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(4)] -(4)-> "A"(4) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(15)] -(15)-> "A"(15) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(7)] -(7)-> "A"(7) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(8)] -(8)-> "A"(8) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(2)] -(2)-> "A"(2) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(13)] -(13)-> "A"(13) False :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) False :: [] -(0)-> "A"(2) False :: [] -(0)-> "A"(4) False :: [] -(0)-> "A"(5) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(4) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(15) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(12) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(14) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(8) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(10) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(7) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(2) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(13) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(6) True :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) True :: [] -(0)-> "A"(2) True :: [] -(0)-> "A"(8) True :: [] -(0)-> "A"(9) f :: ["A"(7) x "A"(4)] -(12)-> "A"(0) f[Ite][False][Ite] :: ["A"(0) x "A"(7) x "A"(4)] -(9)-> "A"(0) g :: ["A"(8) x "A"(4)] -(3)-> "A"(0) g[Ite][False][Ite] :: ["A"(2) x "A"(8) x "A"(4)] -(0)-> "A"(0) goal :: ["A"(15) x "A"(14)] -(16)-> "A"(0) lt0 :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(2) notEmpty :: ["A"(15)] -(9)-> "A"(5) number4 :: ["A"(0)] -(15)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- "Cons_A" :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) "False_A" :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) "Nil_A" :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) "True_A" :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))