/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: foldr#3(Cons(x16,x6)) -> step_x_f(rev_l(),x16,foldr#3(x6)) foldr#3(Nil()) -> fleft_op_e_xs_1() main(Cons(x8,x9)) -> step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x8,foldr#3(x9),Nil()) main(Nil()) -> Nil() rev_l#2(x8,x10) -> Cons(x10,x8) step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x5,fleft_op_e_xs_1(),x3) -> rev_l#2(x3,x5) step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x5,step_x_f(x2,x3,x4),x1) -> step_x_f#1(x2,x3,x4,rev_l#2(x1,x5)) - Signature: {foldr#3/1,main/1,rev_l#2/2,step_x_f#1/4} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,fleft_op_e_xs_1/0,rev_l/0,step_x_f/3} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {foldr#3,main,rev_l#2,step_x_f#1} and constructors {Cons ,Nil,fleft_op_e_xs_1,rev_l,step_x_f} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: foldr#3(Cons(x16,x6)) -> step_x_f(rev_l(),x16,foldr#3(x6)) foldr#3(Nil()) -> fleft_op_e_xs_1() main(Cons(x8,x9)) -> step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x8,foldr#3(x9),Nil()) main(Nil()) -> Nil() rev_l#2(x8,x10) -> Cons(x10,x8) step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x5,fleft_op_e_xs_1(),x3) -> rev_l#2(x3,x5) step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x5,step_x_f(x2,x3,x4),x1) -> step_x_f#1(x2,x3,x4,rev_l#2(x1,x5)) - Signature: {foldr#3/1,main/1,rev_l#2/2,step_x_f#1/4} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,fleft_op_e_xs_1/0,rev_l/0,step_x_f/3} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {foldr#3,main,rev_l#2,step_x_f#1} and constructors {Cons ,Nil,fleft_op_e_xs_1,rev_l,step_x_f} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: foldr#3(y){y -> Cons(x,y)} = foldr#3(Cons(x,y)) ->^+ step_x_f(rev_l(),x,foldr#3(y)) = C[foldr#3(y) = foldr#3(y){}] ** Step 1.b:1: Ara WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: foldr#3(Cons(x16,x6)) -> step_x_f(rev_l(),x16,foldr#3(x6)) foldr#3(Nil()) -> fleft_op_e_xs_1() main(Cons(x8,x9)) -> step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x8,foldr#3(x9),Nil()) main(Nil()) -> Nil() rev_l#2(x8,x10) -> Cons(x10,x8) step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x5,fleft_op_e_xs_1(),x3) -> rev_l#2(x3,x5) step_x_f#1(rev_l(),x5,step_x_f(x2,x3,x4),x1) -> step_x_f#1(x2,x3,x4,rev_l#2(x1,x5)) - Signature: {foldr#3/1,main/1,rev_l#2/2,step_x_f#1/4} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,fleft_op_e_xs_1/0,rev_l/0,step_x_f/3} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {foldr#3,main,rev_l#2,step_x_f#1} and constructors {Cons ,Nil,fleft_op_e_xs_1,rev_l,step_x_f} + Applied Processor: Ara {araHeuristics = NoHeuristics, minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 2, araTimeout = 5, araRuleShifting = Nothing} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- Cons :: ["A"(14) x "A"(14)] -(14)-> "A"(14) Cons :: ["A"(15) x "A"(15)] -(15)-> "A"(15) Cons :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(14) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(15) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(2) Nil :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) fleft_op_e_xs_1 :: [] -(0)-> "A"(8) fleft_op_e_xs_1 :: [] -(0)-> "A"(12) foldr#3 :: ["A"(14)] -(10)-> "A"(8) main :: ["A"(15)] -(11)-> "A"(0) rev_l :: [] -(0)-> "A"(4) rev_l :: [] -(0)-> "A"(8) rev_l#2 :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) step_x_f :: ["A"(8) x "A"(0) x "A"(8)] -(8)-> "A"(8) step_x_f#1 :: ["A"(4) x "A"(0) x "A"(8) x "A"(0)] -(12)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- "Cons_A" :: ["A"(1) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) "Nil_A" :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) "fleft_op_e_xs_1_A" :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) "rev_l_A" :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) "step_x_f_A" :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(1) WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))