/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) * Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: p(f(f(x))) -> q(f(g(x))) p(g(g(x))) -> q(g(f(x))) q(f(f(x))) -> p(f(g(x))) q(g(g(x))) -> p(g(f(x))) - Signature: {p/1,q/1} / {f/1,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {p,q} and constructors {f,g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: DependencyPairs WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: p(f(f(x))) -> q(f(g(x))) p(g(g(x))) -> q(g(f(x))) q(f(f(x))) -> p(f(g(x))) q(g(g(x))) -> p(g(f(x))) - Signature: {p/1,q/1} / {f/1,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {p,q} and constructors {f,g} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs p#(f(f(x))) -> c_1(q#(f(g(x)))) p#(g(g(x))) -> c_2(q#(g(f(x)))) q#(f(f(x))) -> c_3(p#(f(g(x)))) q#(g(g(x))) -> c_4(p#(g(f(x)))) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: p#(f(f(x))) -> c_1(q#(f(g(x)))) p#(g(g(x))) -> c_2(q#(g(f(x)))) q#(f(f(x))) -> c_3(p#(f(g(x)))) q#(g(g(x))) -> c_4(p#(g(f(x)))) - Weak TRS: p(f(f(x))) -> q(f(g(x))) p(g(g(x))) -> q(g(f(x))) q(f(f(x))) -> p(f(g(x))) q(g(g(x))) -> p(g(f(x))) - Signature: {p/1,q/1,p#/1,q#/1} / {f/1,g/1,c_1/1,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {p#,q#} and constructors {f,g} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1,2,3,4} by application of Pre({1,2,3,4}) = {}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: p#(f(f(x))) -> c_1(q#(f(g(x)))) 2: p#(g(g(x))) -> c_2(q#(g(f(x)))) 3: q#(f(f(x))) -> c_3(p#(f(g(x)))) 4: q#(g(g(x))) -> c_4(p#(g(f(x)))) * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: p#(f(f(x))) -> c_1(q#(f(g(x)))) p#(g(g(x))) -> c_2(q#(g(f(x)))) q#(f(f(x))) -> c_3(p#(f(g(x)))) q#(g(g(x))) -> c_4(p#(g(f(x)))) - Weak TRS: p(f(f(x))) -> q(f(g(x))) p(g(g(x))) -> q(g(f(x))) q(f(f(x))) -> p(f(g(x))) q(g(g(x))) -> p(g(f(x))) - Signature: {p/1,q/1,p#/1,q#/1} / {f/1,g/1,c_1/1,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {p#,q#} and constructors {f,g} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:W:p#(f(f(x))) -> c_1(q#(f(g(x)))) 2:W:p#(g(g(x))) -> c_2(q#(g(f(x)))) 3:W:q#(f(f(x))) -> c_3(p#(f(g(x)))) 4:W:q#(g(g(x))) -> c_4(p#(g(f(x)))) The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 4: q#(g(g(x))) -> c_4(p#(g(f(x)))) 3: q#(f(f(x))) -> c_3(p#(f(g(x)))) 2: p#(g(g(x))) -> c_2(q#(g(f(x)))) 1: p#(f(f(x))) -> c_1(q#(f(g(x)))) * Step 5: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: p(f(f(x))) -> q(f(g(x))) p(g(g(x))) -> q(g(f(x))) q(f(f(x))) -> p(f(g(x))) q(g(g(x))) -> p(g(f(x))) - Signature: {p/1,q/1,p#/1,q#/1} / {f/1,g/1,c_1/1,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {p#,q#} and constructors {f,g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(1))