/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NO
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven:

(0) OTRS
(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
(2) NO


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Term rewrite system R:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   hd(cons) -> X
   tl(cons) -> Y
   nats -> adx(zeros)
   zeros -> cons
   incr(cons) -> cons
   adx(cons) -> incr(cons)



Outermost Strategy.

----------------------------------------

(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
Term rewrite system R:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   hd(cons) -> X
   tl(cons) -> Y
   nats -> adx(zeros)
   zeros -> cons
   incr(cons) -> cons
   adx(cons) -> incr(cons)



Outermost Strategy.

---------- Loop: ----------

hd(cons) -> hd(cons) with rule hd(cons) -> X at position [] and matcher [X / hd(cons)]

Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [ ] occurs in the last term at position [].

Context: []

We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop.
----------------------------------------

(2)
NO