/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven: (0) OTRS (1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms] (2) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Term rewrite system R: The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) 2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil 2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, Z)) 2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil 2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, Z)) pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0)) plus(0, Y) -> Y plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y)) times(0, Y) -> 0 times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y)) square(X) -> times(X, X) Outermost Strategy. ---------------------------------------- (1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) Term rewrite system R: The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) 2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil 2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, Z)) 2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil 2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, Z)) pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0)) plus(0, Y) -> Y plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y)) times(0, Y) -> 0 times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y)) square(X) -> times(X, X) Outermost Strategy. ---------- Loop: ---------- from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) with rule from(X') -> cons(X', from(s(X'))) at position [] and matcher [X' / X] Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [X / s(X)] occurs in the last term at position [1]. Context: cons(X, []) We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop. ---------------------------------------- (2) NO