/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty termination of the given Bare JBC problem could be proven: (0) Bare JBC problem (1) BareJBCToJBCProof [EQUIVALENT, 96 ms] (2) JBC problem (3) JBCToGraph [EQUIVALENT, 452 ms] (4) JBCTerminationGraph (5) TerminationGraphToSCCProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (6) JBCTerminationSCC (7) SCCToIRSProof [SOUND, 111 ms] (8) IRSwT (9) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) IRSwT (11) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) IRSwT (13) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (14) IRSwT (15) IRSwTChainingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) IRSwT (17) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) IRSwT (19) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (20) IRSwT (21) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 19 ms] (22) IntTRS (23) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (24) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: public class Et1 { public static void main(String[] args) { Random.args = args; int a = - Random.random(); int b = - Random.random(); while (a > b) { b = b + a; a = a + 1; } } } public class Random { static String[] args; static int index = 0; public static int random() { if (index >= args.length) return 0; String string = args[index]; index++; return string.length(); } } ---------------------------------------- (1) BareJBCToJBCProof (EQUIVALENT) initialized classpath ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: public class Et1 { public static void main(String[] args) { Random.args = args; int a = - Random.random(); int b = - Random.random(); while (a > b) { b = b + a; a = a + 1; } } } public class Random { static String[] args; static int index = 0; public static int random() { if (index >= args.length) return 0; String string = args[index]; index++; return string.length(); } } ---------------------------------------- (3) JBCToGraph (EQUIVALENT) Constructed TerminationGraph. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination Graph based on JBC Program: Et1.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V: Graph of 226 nodes with 1 SCC. ---------------------------------------- (5) TerminationGraphToSCCProof (SOUND) Splitted TerminationGraph to 1 SCCs. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: SCC of termination graph based on JBC Program. SCC contains nodes from the following methods: Et1.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V SCC calls the following helper methods: Performed SCC analyses: *Used field analysis yielded the following read fields: *Marker field analysis yielded the following relations that could be markers: ---------------------------------------- (7) SCCToIRSProof (SOUND) Transformed FIGraph SCCs to intTRSs. Log: Generated rules. Obtained 14 IRulesP rules: f911_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_911), i184, i185, i184) -> f933_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_933), i184, i185, i184, i185) :|: TRUE f933_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_933), i184, i185, i184, i185) -> f938_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_938), i184, i185, i184, i185) :|: i184 > i185 f938_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_938), i184, i185, i184, i185) -> f953_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_953), i184, i185) :|: i184 > i185 f953_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_953), i184, i185) -> f955_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_955), i184, i185) :|: TRUE f955_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_955), i184, i185) -> f956_0_main_IntArithmetic(EOS(STATIC_956), i184, i185, i184) :|: TRUE f956_0_main_IntArithmetic(EOS(STATIC_956), i184, i185, i184) -> f957_0_main_Store(EOS(STATIC_957), i184, i185 + i184) :|: TRUE f957_0_main_Store(EOS(STATIC_957), i184, i214) -> f958_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_958), i184, i214) :|: TRUE f958_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_958), i184, i214) -> f959_0_main_ConstantStackPush(EOS(STATIC_959), i214, i184) :|: TRUE f959_0_main_ConstantStackPush(EOS(STATIC_959), i214, i184) -> f960_0_main_IntArithmetic(EOS(STATIC_960), i214, i184, 1) :|: TRUE f960_0_main_IntArithmetic(EOS(STATIC_960), i214, i184, matching1) -> f961_0_main_Store(EOS(STATIC_961), i214, i184 + 1) :|: TRUE && matching1 = 1 f961_0_main_Store(EOS(STATIC_961), i214, i215) -> f962_0_main_JMP(EOS(STATIC_962), i215, i214) :|: TRUE f962_0_main_JMP(EOS(STATIC_962), i215, i214) -> f982_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_982), i215, i214) :|: TRUE f982_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_982), i215, i214) -> f906_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_906), i215, i214) :|: TRUE f906_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_906), i184, i185) -> f911_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_911), i184, i185, i184) :|: TRUE Combined rules. Obtained 1 IRulesP rules: f911_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_911), i184:0, i185:0, i184:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_911), i184:0 + 1, i185:0 + i184:0, i184:0 + 1) :|: i185:0 < i184:0 Filtered constant ground arguments: f911_0_main_Load(x1, x2, x3, x4) -> f911_0_main_Load(x2, x3, x4) EOS(x1) -> EOS Filtered duplicate arguments: f911_0_main_Load(x1, x2, x3) -> f911_0_main_Load(x2, x3) Finished conversion. Obtained 1 rules.P rules: f911_0_main_Load(i185:0, i184:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(i185:0 + i184:0, i184:0 + 1) :|: i185:0 < i184:0 ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f911_0_main_Load(i185:0, i184:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(i185:0 + i184:0, i184:0 + 1) :|: i185:0 < i184:0 ---------------------------------------- (9) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Rules: f911_0_main_Load(i185:0, i184:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(arith, arith1) :|: i185:0 < i184:0 && arith = i185:0 + i184:0 && arith1 = i184:0 + 1 ---------------------------------------- (11) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f911_0_main_Load(i185:0, i184:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(arith, arith1) :|: i185:0 < i184:0 && arith = i185:0 + i184:0 && arith1 = i184:0 + 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f911_0_main_Load(i185:0, i184:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(arith, arith1) :|: i185:0 < i184:0 && arith = i185:0 + i184:0 && arith1 = i184:0 + 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (13) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Rules: f911_0_main_Load(i185:0:0, i184:0:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(i185:0:0 + i184:0:0, i184:0:0 + 1) :|: i185:0:0 < i184:0:0 ---------------------------------------- (15) IRSwTChainingProof (EQUIVALENT) Chaining! ---------------------------------------- (16) Obligation: Rules: f911_0_main_Load(x, x1) -> f911_0_main_Load(x + 2 * x1 + 1, x1 + 2) :|: TRUE && x + -1 * x1 <= -1 && x <= 0 ---------------------------------------- (17) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f911_0_main_Load(x, x1) -> f911_0_main_Load(x + 2 * x1 + 1, x1 + 2) :|: TRUE && x + -1 * x1 <= -1 && x <= 0 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (18) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f911_0_main_Load(x, x1) -> f911_0_main_Load(x + 2 * x1 + 1, x1 + 2) :|: TRUE && x + -1 * x1 <= -1 && x <= 0 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (19) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (20) Obligation: Rules: f911_0_main_Load(x:0, x1:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(x:0 + 2 * x1:0 + 1, x1:0 + 2) :|: x:0 < 1 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 <= -1 ---------------------------------------- (21) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f911_0_main_Load(INTEGER, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (22) Obligation: Rules: f911_0_main_Load(x:0, x1:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(c, c1) :|: c1 = x1:0 + 2 && c = x:0 + 2 * x1:0 + 1 && (x:0 < 1 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 <= -1) ---------------------------------------- (23) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f911_0_main_Load(x, x1)] = 1 - 2*x - 2*x1 + x1^2 The following rules are decreasing: f911_0_main_Load(x:0, x1:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(c, c1) :|: c1 = x1:0 + 2 && c = x:0 + 2 * x1:0 + 1 && (x:0 < 1 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 <= -1) The following rules are bounded: f911_0_main_Load(x:0, x1:0) -> f911_0_main_Load(c, c1) :|: c1 = x1:0 + 2 && c = x:0 + 2 * x1:0 + 1 && (x:0 < 1 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 <= -1) ---------------------------------------- (24) YES