/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty termination of the given Bare JBC problem could be disproven: (0) Bare JBC problem (1) BareJBCToJBCProof [EQUIVALENT, 96 ms] (2) JBC problem (3) JBCToGraph [EQUIVALENT, 177 ms] (4) JBCTerminationGraph (5) JBCNonTerm [COMPLETE, 80 ms] (6) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: package simple.whileIncr; public class Main { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { WhileIncr.increase(args.length); } } package simple.whileIncr; public class WhileIncr { public static void increase(int i) { while (i > 0) { i++; } } } ---------------------------------------- (1) BareJBCToJBCProof (EQUIVALENT) initialized classpath ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: package simple.whileIncr; public class Main { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { WhileIncr.increase(args.length); } } package simple.whileIncr; public class WhileIncr { public static void increase(int i) { while (i > 0) { i++; } } } ---------------------------------------- (3) JBCToGraph (EQUIVALENT) Constructed TerminationGraph. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination Graph based on JBC Program: simple.whileIncr.Main.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V: Graph of 15 nodes with 1 SCC. ---------------------------------------- (5) JBCNonTerm (COMPLETE) Reached a loop using the following run: 0: a10([java.lang.String...]): length 1 -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) 1: a10([java.lang.String...]): length 1 -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) 2: YES: (JL1) 3: YES: (JL1) Start state of loop: [a4(lv_0_0)] i17: [0,+inf)(l1) i18: [0,+inf)(l1) a4([java.lang.String...]): length i18 -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) In the loop head node, references [i17] were interesting. All methods calls in the loop body are side-effect free, hence they can be ignored. By SMT, we could prove ((0 <= initial_i17 and 0 <= initial_i18) and (((path1_i17 = path1_i132 and path1_i139 = (path1_i132 + 1) and path1_i139 = res_i17 and path1_i17 = initial_i17) and path1_i132 > 0) and ((res1_i17 = res1_i132 and res1_i139 = (res1_i132 + 1) and res_i17 = res1_i17) and !res1_i132 > 0))) to be UNSAT. Consequently, the loop will not terminate. ---------------------------------------- (6) NO