/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty termination of the given Bare JBC problem could be disproven: (0) Bare JBC problem (1) BareJBCToJBCProof [EQUIVALENT, 97 ms] (2) JBC problem (3) JBCToGraph [EQUIVALENT, 301 ms] (4) JBCTerminationGraph (5) JBCNonTerm [COMPLETE, 204 ms] (6) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: package simple.gauss; public class Gauss { // does not terminate for negative numbers public static int sum(int n) { int sum = 0; while (n != 0) { sum += n; n--; } return sum; } } package simple.gauss; public class Main { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { int value = args[1].length(); if (args[0].length() % 2 == 0) { value = -value; } Gauss.sum(value); } } ---------------------------------------- (1) BareJBCToJBCProof (EQUIVALENT) initialized classpath ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: package simple.gauss; public class Gauss { // does not terminate for negative numbers public static int sum(int n) { int sum = 0; while (n != 0) { sum += n; n--; } return sum; } } package simple.gauss; public class Main { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { int value = args[1].length(); if (args[0].length() % 2 == 0) { value = -value; } Gauss.sum(value); } } ---------------------------------------- (3) JBCToGraph (EQUIVALENT) Constructed TerminationGraph. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination Graph based on JBC Program: simple.gauss.Main.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V: Graph of 139 nodes with 2 SCCs. ---------------------------------------- (5) JBCNonTerm (COMPLETE) Reached a loop using the following run: 0: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 1: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 2: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 3: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 4: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 5: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 6: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 7: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 8: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 9: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 10: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} a27([java.lang.String...]): {o33, o15} -->{java.lang.Object...} o15!: String(count=1, hash=#, offset=0, value=o16?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} o16:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} a27-><-o34 a27-><-o33 a27-><-o16 a27-><-o15 YES: (JL1) 11: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) 12: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) 13: o33!: String(count=0, hash=#, offset=0, value=o34?) -->{java.lang.Object...} o34:: [CHAR] -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) 14: YES: (JL1) 15: YES: (JL1) 16: YES: (JL1) 17: YES: (JL1) 18: YES: (JL1) 19: YES: (JL1) 20: YES: (JL1) 21: YES: (JL1) 22: YES: (JL1) 23: YES: (JL1) 24: YES: (JL1) 25: YES: (JL1) Start state of loop: [a16(lv_0_0)] i337: (-inf,0](u2){-inf,+inf} i338: (-inf,0](u2){-inf,+inf} i6: [2,+inf){0,+inf} a16([java.lang.String...]): length i6 -->{java.lang.Object...} YES: (JL1) In the loop head node, references [i337] were interesting. All methods calls in the loop body are side-effect free, hence they can be ignored. By SMT, we could prove ((initial_i337 <= 0 and initial_i338 <= 0 and 2 <= initial_i6) and (((path1_i337 = path1_i366 and path1_i371 = (path1_i338 + path1_i366) and path1_i374 = (path1_i366 + -1) and path1_i374 = res_i337 and path1_i337 = initial_i337) and path1_i366 < 0) and ((res1_i337 = res1_i366 and res1_i371 = (res1_i338 + res1_i366) and res1_i374 = (res1_i366 + -1) and res_i337 = res1_i337) and !res1_i366 < 0))) to be UNSAT. Consequently, the loop will not terminate. ---------------------------------------- (6) NO