/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty termination of the given Bare JBC problem could be proven: (0) Bare JBC problem (1) BareJBCToJBCProof [EQUIVALENT, 96 ms] (2) JBC problem (3) JBCToGraph [EQUIVALENT, 322 ms] (4) JBCTerminationGraph (5) TerminationGraphToSCCProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (6) JBCTerminationSCC (7) SCCToIRSProof [SOUND, 21 ms] (8) IRSwT (9) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) IRSwT (11) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 42 ms] (12) IRSwT (13) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (14) IRSwT (15) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 18 ms] (16) IntTRS (17) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: /** * Example taken from "A Term Rewriting Approach to the Automated Termination * Analysis of Imperative Programs" (http://www.cs.unm.edu/~spf/papers/2009-02.pdf) * and converted to Java. */ public class PastaA6 { public static void main(String[] args) { Random.args = args; int x = Random.random(); int y = Random.random(); int z = Random.random(); while (x > y + z) { y++; z++; } } } public class Random { static String[] args; static int index = 0; public static int random() { String string = args[index]; index++; return string.length(); } } ---------------------------------------- (1) BareJBCToJBCProof (EQUIVALENT) initialized classpath ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: need to prove termination of the following program: /** * Example taken from "A Term Rewriting Approach to the Automated Termination * Analysis of Imperative Programs" (http://www.cs.unm.edu/~spf/papers/2009-02.pdf) * and converted to Java. */ public class PastaA6 { public static void main(String[] args) { Random.args = args; int x = Random.random(); int y = Random.random(); int z = Random.random(); while (x > y + z) { y++; z++; } } } public class Random { static String[] args; static int index = 0; public static int random() { String string = args[index]; index++; return string.length(); } } ---------------------------------------- (3) JBCToGraph (EQUIVALENT) Constructed TerminationGraph. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination Graph based on JBC Program: PastaA6.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V: Graph of 244 nodes with 1 SCC. ---------------------------------------- (5) TerminationGraphToSCCProof (SOUND) Splitted TerminationGraph to 1 SCCs. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: SCC of termination graph based on JBC Program. SCC contains nodes from the following methods: PastaA6.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V SCC calls the following helper methods: Performed SCC analyses: *Used field analysis yielded the following read fields: *Marker field analysis yielded the following relations that could be markers: ---------------------------------------- (7) SCCToIRSProof (SOUND) Transformed FIGraph SCCs to intTRSs. Log: Generated rules. Obtained 10 IRulesP rules: f422_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_422), i19, i48, i72, i19) -> f425_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_425), i19, i48, i72, i19, i48) :|: TRUE f425_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_425), i19, i48, i72, i19, i48) -> f427_0_main_IntArithmetic(EOS(STATIC_427), i19, i48, i72, i19, i48, i72) :|: TRUE f427_0_main_IntArithmetic(EOS(STATIC_427), i19, i48, i72, i19, i48, i72) -> f430_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_430), i19, i48, i72, i19, i48 + i72) :|: i48 >= 0 && i72 >= 0 f430_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_430), i19, i48, i72, i19, i74) -> f436_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_436), i19, i48, i72, i19, i74) :|: i19 > i74 f436_0_main_LE(EOS(STATIC_436), i19, i48, i72, i19, i74) -> f467_0_main_Inc(EOS(STATIC_467), i19, i48, i72) :|: i19 > i74 f467_0_main_Inc(EOS(STATIC_467), i19, i48, i72) -> f471_0_main_Inc(EOS(STATIC_471), i19, i48 + 1, i72) :|: TRUE f471_0_main_Inc(EOS(STATIC_471), i19, i78, i72) -> f477_0_main_JMP(EOS(STATIC_477), i19, i78, i72 + 1) :|: TRUE f477_0_main_JMP(EOS(STATIC_477), i19, i78, i79) -> f504_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_504), i19, i78, i79) :|: TRUE f504_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_504), i19, i78, i79) -> f419_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_419), i19, i78, i79) :|: TRUE f419_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_419), i19, i48, i72) -> f422_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_422), i19, i48, i72, i19) :|: TRUE Combined rules. Obtained 1 IRulesP rules: f422_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_422), i19:0, i48:0, i72:0, i19:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(EOS(STATIC_422), i19:0, i48:0 + 1, i72:0 + 1, i19:0) :|: i72:0 > -1 && i48:0 > -1 && i48:0 + i72:0 < i19:0 Filtered constant ground arguments: f422_0_main_Load(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) -> f422_0_main_Load(x2, x3, x4, x5) EOS(x1) -> EOS Filtered duplicate arguments: f422_0_main_Load(x1, x2, x3, x4) -> f422_0_main_Load(x2, x3, x4) Finished conversion. Obtained 1 rules.P rules: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0, i72:0, i19:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(i48:0 + 1, i72:0 + 1, i19:0) :|: i48:0 > -1 && i48:0 + i72:0 < i19:0 && i72:0 > -1 ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0, i72:0, i19:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(i48:0 + 1, i72:0 + 1, i19:0) :|: i48:0 > -1 && i48:0 + i72:0 < i19:0 && i72:0 > -1 ---------------------------------------- (9) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Rules: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0, i72:0, i19:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(arith, arith1, i19:0) :|: i48:0 > -1 && i48:0 + i72:0 < i19:0 && i72:0 > -1 && arith = i48:0 + 1 && arith1 = i72:0 + 1 ---------------------------------------- (11) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f422_0_main_Load(i48:0, i72:0, i19:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(arith, arith1, i19:0) :|: i48:0 > -1 && i48:0 + i72:0 < i19:0 && i72:0 > -1 && arith = i48:0 + 1 && arith1 = i72:0 + 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f422_0_main_Load(i48:0, i72:0, i19:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(arith, arith1, i19:0) :|: i48:0 > -1 && i48:0 + i72:0 < i19:0 && i72:0 > -1 && arith = i48:0 + 1 && arith1 = i72:0 + 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (13) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Rules: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0:0, i72:0:0, i19:0:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(i48:0:0 + 1, i72:0:0 + 1, i19:0:0) :|: i48:0:0 > -1 && i48:0:0 + i72:0:0 < i19:0:0 && i72:0:0 > -1 ---------------------------------------- (15) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f422_0_main_Load(INTEGER, INTEGER, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (16) Obligation: Rules: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0:0, i72:0:0, i19:0:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(c, c1, i19:0:0) :|: c1 = i72:0:0 + 1 && c = i48:0:0 + 1 && (i48:0:0 > -1 && i48:0:0 + i72:0:0 < i19:0:0 && i72:0:0 > -1) ---------------------------------------- (17) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f422_0_main_Load(x, x1, x2)] = -x - x1 + x2 The following rules are decreasing: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0:0, i72:0:0, i19:0:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(c, c1, i19:0:0) :|: c1 = i72:0:0 + 1 && c = i48:0:0 + 1 && (i48:0:0 > -1 && i48:0:0 + i72:0:0 < i19:0:0 && i72:0:0 > -1) The following rules are bounded: f422_0_main_Load(i48:0:0, i72:0:0, i19:0:0) -> f422_0_main_Load(c, c1, i19:0:0) :|: c1 = i72:0:0 + 1 && c = i48:0:0 + 1 && (i48:0:0 > -1 && i48:0:0 + i72:0:0 < i19:0:0 && i72:0:0 > -1) ---------------------------------------- (18) YES