/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Left Termination of the query pattern tree_member(a,g) w.r.t. the given Prolog program could successfully be proven: (0) Prolog (1) PrologToPiTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (2) PiTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) PiDP (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) PiDP (7) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) PiDP (9) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (10) QDP (11) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Clauses: tree_member(X, tree(X, X1, X2)). tree_member(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) :- tree_member(X, Left). tree_member(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) :- tree_member(X, Right). Query: tree_member(a,g) ---------------------------------------- (1) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND) We use the technique of [TOCL09]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes: tree_member_in_2: (f,b) Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System: Pi-finite rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_out_ag(X, Right)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_out_ag(X, Left)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping: tree_member_in_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_in_ag(x2) tree(x1, x2, x3) = tree(x1, x2, x3) tree_member_out_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_out_ag(x1) U1_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_ag(x5) U2_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ag(x5) Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Pi-finite rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_out_ag(X, Right)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_out_ag(X, Left)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping: tree_member_in_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_in_ag(x2) tree(x1, x2, x3) = tree(x1, x2, x3) tree_member_out_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_out_ag(x1) U1_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_ag(x5) U2_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ag(x5) ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem: Pi DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_AG(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Left) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_AG(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Right) The TRS R consists of the following rules: tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_out_ag(X, Right)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_out_ag(X, Left)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping: tree_member_in_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_in_ag(x2) tree(x1, x2, x3) = tree(x1, x2, x3) tree_member_out_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_out_ag(x1) U1_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_ag(x5) U2_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ag(x5) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x1, x2) = TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x2) U1_AG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_AG(x5) U2_AG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_AG(x5) We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Pi DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_AG(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Left) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_AG(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Right) The TRS R consists of the following rules: tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_out_ag(X, Right)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_out_ag(X, Left)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping: tree_member_in_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_in_ag(x2) tree(x1, x2, x3) = tree(x1, x2, x3) tree_member_out_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_out_ag(x1) U1_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_ag(x5) U2_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ag(x5) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x1, x2) = TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x2) U1_AG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_AG(x5) U2_AG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_AG(x5) We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains ---------------------------------------- (5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Pi DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Right) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Left) The TRS R consists of the following rules: tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X, X1, X2)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_in_ag(X, Left)) tree_member_in_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_in_ag(X, Right)) U2_ag(X, X5, X6, Right, tree_member_out_ag(X, Right)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) U1_ag(X, X3, Left, X4, tree_member_out_ag(X, Left)) -> tree_member_out_ag(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping: tree_member_in_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_in_ag(x2) tree(x1, x2, x3) = tree(x1, x2, x3) tree_member_out_ag(x1, x2) = tree_member_out_ag(x1) U1_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U1_ag(x5) U2_ag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = U2_ag(x5) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x1, x2) = TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x2) We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains ---------------------------------------- (7) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT) For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Pi DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Right) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(X, Left) R is empty. The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping: tree(x1, x2, x3) = tree(x1, x2, x3) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x1, x2) = TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(x2) We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains ---------------------------------------- (9) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND) Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi. ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(Right) TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(Left) R is empty. Q is empty. We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (11) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: *TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(tree(X5, X6, Right)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(Right) The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 *TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(tree(X3, Left, X4)) -> TREE_MEMBER_IN_AG(Left) The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 ---------------------------------------- (12) YES