/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> 0() g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(g(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {0,f,g,s} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 2. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_1() -> 1 0_1() -> 2 0_2() -> 1 0_2() -> 2 f_0(1) -> 1 f_1(2) -> 1 f_1(2) -> 2 g_0(1) -> 1 g_1(1) -> 2 s_0(1) -> 1 * Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(0()) -> 0() g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(g(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {0,f,g,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))