/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
* Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(x,y),f(y,y)) -> f(g(y,x),y)
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {g/2}
        - Obligation:
             derivational complexity wrt. signature {f,g}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation:
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          all
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(f) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [11]
          p(g) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0] 
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        f(g(x,y),f(y,y)) = [1] x + [3] y + [22]
                         > [1] x + [2] y + [11]
                         = f(g(y,x),y)         
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(g(x,y),f(y,y)) -> f(g(y,x),y)
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {g/2}
        - Obligation:
             derivational complexity wrt. signature {f,g}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))