/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) * Step 1: WeightGap WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: div(X,e()) -> i(X) div(div(X,Y),Z) -> div(Y,div(i(X),Z)) i(div(X,Y)) -> div(Y,X) - Signature: {div/2,i/1} / {e/0} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {div,e,i} + Applied Processor: WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = NoUArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny} + Details: The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(div) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [6] p(e) = [0] p(i) = [1] x1 + [1] Following rules are strictly oriented: div(X,e()) = [1] X + [6] > [1] X + [1] = i(X) i(div(X,Y)) = [1] X + [1] Y + [7] > [1] X + [1] Y + [6] = div(Y,X) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: div(div(X,Y),Z) = [1] X + [1] Y + [1] Z + [12] >= [1] X + [1] Y + [1] Z + [13] = div(Y,div(i(X),Z)) Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. * Step 2: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: div(div(X,Y),Z) -> div(Y,div(i(X),Z)) - Weak TRS: div(X,e()) -> i(X) i(div(X,Y)) -> div(Y,X) - Signature: {div/2,i/1} / {e/0} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {div,e,i} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 2, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(div) = [1 1] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0] [0 1] [0 1] [1] p(e) = [6] [0] p(i) = [1 1] x1 + [0] [0 1] [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: div(div(X,Y),Z) = [1 2] X + [1 1] Y + [1 0] Z + [1] [0 1] [0 1] [0 1] [2] > [1 2] X + [1 1] Y + [1 0] Z + [0] [0 1] [0 1] [0 1] [2] = div(Y,div(i(X),Z)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: div(X,e()) = [1 1] X + [6] [0 1] [1] >= [1 1] X + [0] [0 1] [0] = i(X) i(div(X,Y)) = [1 2] X + [1 1] Y + [1] [0 1] [0 1] [1] >= [1 0] X + [1 1] Y + [0] [0 1] [0 1] [1] = div(Y,X) * Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: div(X,e()) -> i(X) div(div(X,Y),Z) -> div(Y,div(i(X),Z)) i(div(X,Y)) -> div(Y,X) - Signature: {div/2,i/1} / {e/0} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {div,e,i} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))