/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(c(c(c(x1)))) -> d(d(x1)) b(d(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(x1) -> a(a(a(a(x1)))) c(c(c(a(x1)))) -> d(d(x1)) d(x1) -> b(b(b(b(x1)))) d(b(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1,d/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c,d} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1] x1 + [30] p(b) = [1] x1 + [50] p(c) = [1] x1 + [128] p(d) = [1] x1 + [207] Following rules are strictly oriented: b(d(x1)) = [1] x1 + [257] > [1] x1 + [256] = c(c(x1)) c(x1) = [1] x1 + [128] > [1] x1 + [120] = a(a(a(a(x1)))) d(x1) = [1] x1 + [207] > [1] x1 + [200] = b(b(b(b(x1)))) d(b(x1)) = [1] x1 + [257] > [1] x1 + [256] = c(c(x1)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: a(c(c(c(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [414] >= [1] x1 + [414] = d(d(x1)) c(c(c(a(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [414] >= [1] x1 + [414] = d(d(x1)) * Step 2: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(c(c(c(x1)))) -> d(d(x1)) c(c(c(a(x1)))) -> d(d(x1)) - Weak TRS: b(d(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(x1) -> a(a(a(a(x1)))) d(x1) -> b(b(b(b(x1)))) d(b(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1,d/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c,d} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1] x1 + [10] p(b) = [1] x1 + [16] p(c) = [1] x1 + [40] p(d) = [1] x1 + [64] Following rules are strictly oriented: a(c(c(c(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [130] > [1] x1 + [128] = d(d(x1)) c(c(c(a(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [130] > [1] x1 + [128] = d(d(x1)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: b(d(x1)) = [1] x1 + [80] >= [1] x1 + [80] = c(c(x1)) c(x1) = [1] x1 + [40] >= [1] x1 + [40] = a(a(a(a(x1)))) d(x1) = [1] x1 + [64] >= [1] x1 + [64] = b(b(b(b(x1)))) d(b(x1)) = [1] x1 + [80] >= [1] x1 + [80] = c(c(x1)) * Step 3: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a(c(c(c(x1)))) -> d(d(x1)) b(d(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(x1) -> a(a(a(a(x1)))) c(c(c(a(x1)))) -> d(d(x1)) d(x1) -> b(b(b(b(x1)))) d(b(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1,d/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c,d} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))