/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,x,y) -> x f(x,y,y) -> y f(x,y,g(y)) -> x f(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f(x,y,f(z,u,v)) f(g(x),x,y) -> y - Signature: {f/3} / {g/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {f,g} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(f) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] x3 + [7] p(g) = [1] x1 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: f(x,x,y) = [2] x + [1] y + [7] > [1] x + [0] = x f(x,y,y) = [1] x + [2] y + [7] > [1] y + [0] = y f(x,y,g(y)) = [1] x + [2] y + [7] > [1] x + [0] = x f(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) = [1] u + [1] v + [2] x + [2] y + [1] z + [21] > [1] u + [1] v + [1] x + [1] y + [1] z + [14] = f(x,y,f(z,u,v)) f(g(x),x,y) = [2] x + [1] y + [7] > [1] y + [0] = y Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: * Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(x,x,y) -> x f(x,y,y) -> y f(x,y,g(y)) -> x f(f(x,y,z),u,f(x,y,v)) -> f(x,y,f(z,u,v)) f(g(x),x,y) -> y - Signature: {f/3} / {g/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {f,g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))