/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(+(x,y)) -> *(f(x),f(y)) f(+(x,s(0()))) -> +(s(s(0())),f(x)) f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(0())) -> *(s(s(0())),f(0())) f(s(0())) -> s(s(0())) - Signature: {f/1} / {*/2,+/2,0/0,s/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,+,0,f,s} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 3. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. *_0(1,1) -> 1 *_1(2,3) -> 1 *_1(3,3) -> 2 *_1(3,3) -> 3 *_1(4,7) -> 1 *_1(4,7) -> 2 *_1(4,7) -> 3 *_2(8,9) -> 2 *_2(8,9) -> 3 *_2(8,9) -> 9 *_3(14,15) -> 9 +_0(1,1) -> 1 +_1(4,2) -> 1 +_1(4,3) -> 1 +_1(4,3) -> 2 +_1(4,3) -> 3 +_2(8,8) -> 2 +_2(8,8) -> 3 +_2(8,8) -> 9 0_0() -> 1 0_1() -> 6 0_2() -> 10 0_2() -> 12 0_3() -> 13 f_0(1) -> 1 f_1(1) -> 2 f_1(1) -> 3 f_1(2) -> 3 f_1(3) -> 3 f_1(4) -> 2 f_1(6) -> 7 f_2(2) -> 9 f_2(3) -> 9 f_2(4) -> 8 f_2(8) -> 8 f_2(8) -> 9 f_2(10) -> 9 f_3(8) -> 14 f_3(8) -> 15 s_0(1) -> 1 s_1(5) -> 1 s_1(5) -> 2 s_1(5) -> 3 s_1(5) -> 4 s_1(6) -> 1 s_1(6) -> 2 s_1(6) -> 3 s_1(6) -> 5 s_2(11) -> 2 s_2(11) -> 3 s_2(11) -> 8 s_2(11) -> 9 s_2(12) -> 7 s_2(12) -> 11 s_3(13) -> 9 * Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(+(x,y)) -> *(f(x),f(y)) f(+(x,s(0()))) -> +(s(s(0())),f(x)) f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(0())) -> *(s(s(0())),f(0())) f(s(0())) -> s(s(0())) - Signature: {f/1} / {*/2,+/2,0/0,s/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,+,0,f,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))