/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(a(x1)) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(b(x1)) -> c(c(c(x1))) c(c(c(c(x1)))) -> a(b(x1)) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1] x1 + [38] p(b) = [1] x1 + [25] p(c) = [1] x1 + [16] Following rules are strictly oriented: a(a(x1)) = [1] x1 + [76] > [1] x1 + [75] = b(b(b(x1))) b(b(x1)) = [1] x1 + [50] > [1] x1 + [48] = c(c(c(x1))) c(c(c(c(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [64] > [1] x1 + [63] = a(b(x1)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: * Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a(a(x1)) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(b(x1)) -> c(c(c(x1))) c(c(c(c(x1)))) -> a(b(x1)) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))