/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> b(c(x1)) b(c(x1)) -> c(b(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1] x1 + [44] p(b) = [1] x1 + [64] p(c) = [1] x1 + [112] Following rules are strictly oriented: c(b(x1)) = [1] x1 + [176] > [1] x1 + [132] = a(a(a(x1))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: a(a(a(a(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [176] >= [1] x1 + [176] = b(c(x1)) b(c(x1)) = [1] x1 + [176] >= [1] x1 + [176] = c(b(x1)) * Step 2: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> b(c(x1)) b(c(x1)) -> c(b(x1)) - Weak TRS: c(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1] x1 + [19] p(b) = [1] x1 + [34] p(c) = [1] x1 + [33] Following rules are strictly oriented: a(a(a(a(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [76] > [1] x1 + [67] = b(c(x1)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: b(c(x1)) = [1] x1 + [67] >= [1] x1 + [67] = c(b(x1)) c(b(x1)) = [1] x1 + [67] >= [1] x1 + [57] = a(a(a(x1))) * Step 3: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: b(c(x1)) -> c(b(x1)) - Weak TRS: a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> b(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 2, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1 1] x1 + [10] [0 1] [48] p(b) = [1 1] x1 + [48] [0 1] [32] p(c) = [1 2] x1 + [130] [0 1] [128] Following rules are strictly oriented: b(c(x1)) = [1 3] x1 + [306] [0 1] [160] > [1 3] x1 + [242] [0 1] [160] = c(b(x1)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: a(a(a(a(x1)))) = [1 4] x1 + [328] [0 1] [192] >= [1 3] x1 + [306] [0 1] [160] = b(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) = [1 3] x1 + [242] [0 1] [160] >= [1 3] x1 + [174] [0 1] [144] = a(a(a(x1))) * Step 4: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> b(c(x1)) b(c(x1)) -> c(b(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(a(x1))) - Signature: {a/1,b/1,c/1} / {} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))