3.58/1.70 YES 3.92/1.71 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 3.92/1.71 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 (0) RelTRS 3.92/1.71 (1) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 32 ms] 3.92/1.71 (2) RelTRS 3.92/1.71 (3) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 3.92/1.71 (4) YES 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 ---------------------------------------- 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 (0) 3.92/1.71 Obligation: 3.92/1.71 Relative term rewrite system: 3.92/1.71 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 R(x, B2) -> B2 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 B1 -> R(T, B1) 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 ---------------------------------------- 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 (1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 3.92/1.71 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 3.92/1.71 Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 <<< 3.92/1.71 POL(R(x_1, x_2)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [1, 0]] * x_1 + [[1, 1], [1, 0]] * x_2 3.92/1.71 >>> 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 <<< 3.92/1.71 POL(B2) = [[1], [1]] 3.92/1.71 >>> 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 <<< 3.92/1.71 POL(B1) = [[0], [0]] 3.92/1.71 >>> 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 <<< 3.92/1.71 POL(T) = [[0], [1]] 3.92/1.71 >>> 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 3.92/1.71 Rules from R: 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 R(x, B2) -> B2 3.92/1.71 Rules from S: 3.92/1.71 none 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 ---------------------------------------- 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 (2) 3.92/1.71 Obligation: 3.92/1.71 Relative term rewrite system: 3.92/1.71 R is empty. 3.92/1.71 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 B1 -> R(T, B1) 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 ---------------------------------------- 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 (3) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 3.92/1.71 The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. 3.92/1.71 ---------------------------------------- 3.92/1.71 3.92/1.71 (4) 3.92/1.71 YES 3.92/1.76 EOF