3.82/1.86 YES 4.23/1.87 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 4.23/1.87 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 (0) RelTRS 4.23/1.87 (1) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 36 ms] 4.23/1.87 (2) RelTRS 4.23/1.87 (3) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 4.23/1.87 (4) YES 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 ---------------------------------------- 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 (0) 4.23/1.87 Obligation: 4.23/1.87 Relative term rewrite system: 4.23/1.87 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 f(g(x)) -> x 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 a -> h(g(f(a))) 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 ---------------------------------------- 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 (1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 4.23/1.87 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 4.23/1.87 Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 <<< 4.23/1.87 POL(f(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 2], [2, 0]] * x_1 4.23/1.87 >>> 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 <<< 4.23/1.87 POL(g(x_1)) = [[0], [2]] + [[1, 1], [0, 0]] * x_1 4.23/1.87 >>> 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 <<< 4.23/1.87 POL(a) = [[0], [0]] 4.23/1.87 >>> 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 <<< 4.23/1.87 POL(h(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[2, 0], [0, 0]] * x_1 4.23/1.87 >>> 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 4.23/1.87 Rules from R: 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 f(g(x)) -> x 4.23/1.87 Rules from S: 4.23/1.87 none 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 ---------------------------------------- 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 (2) 4.23/1.87 Obligation: 4.23/1.87 Relative term rewrite system: 4.23/1.87 R is empty. 4.23/1.87 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 a -> h(g(f(a))) 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 ---------------------------------------- 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 (3) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 4.23/1.87 The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. 4.23/1.87 ---------------------------------------- 4.23/1.87 4.23/1.87 (4) 4.23/1.87 YES 4.32/1.92 EOF