2.45/1.68	MAYBE
2.54/1.69	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat
2.54/1.69	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	(0) CpxIntTrs
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	----------------------------------------
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	(0)
2.54/1.69	Obligation:
2.54/1.69	Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_start(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_i)) :|: TRUE
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_i, v_i)) :|: TRUE
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_i)) :|: v_.0 < 0
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_i)) :|: v_.0 >= 0
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0 + 1, v_i)) :|: v_.0 < -(5)
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0 + 1, v_i)) :|: v_.0 > -(5)
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_i)) :|: v_.0 >= -(5) && v_.0 <= -(5)
2.54/1.69	eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_i) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.0, v_i)) :|: TRUE
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.69	The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_2]
2.54/1.69	
2.54/1.71	EOF