3.29/2.36 WORST_CASE(?, O(n^3)) 3.29/2.37 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat 3.29/2.37 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^3). 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (0) CpxIntTrs 3.29/2.37 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 1078 ms] 3.29/2.37 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^3) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 ---------------------------------------- 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (0) 3.29/2.37 Obligation: 3.29/2.37 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_start(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_z, v_y, v_x, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_.04 >= v_.02 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_.04 < v_.02 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_.01 > 1 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_.01 <= 1 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01 - 1, v_.02, v_.04 + v_.01 - 1, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02 + 1, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 3.29/2.37 eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.01, v_.02, v_.04, v_c, v_u, v_v, v_w, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_10] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 ---------------------------------------- 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 3.29/2.37 YES(?, 3*ar_1*ar_3 + 9*ar_1^2 + 3*ar_1*ar_5 + 3*ar_1^3 + 6*ar_3 + 12*ar_1 + 6*ar_5 + 20) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Initial complexity problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 1: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 2: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 A polynomial rank function with 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoostart) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb5in) = 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb4in) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoostop) = 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(koat_start) = 2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 A polynomial rank function with 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoostart) = V_2 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = V_2 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = V_1 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = V_1 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb5in) = V_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = V_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb4in) = V_1 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoostop) = V_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(koat_start) = V_2 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 orients all transitions weakly and the transition 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 4: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 4 produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 5: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Applied AI with 'oct' on problem 5 to obtain the following invariants: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 For symbol evalfoobb1in: X_5 - X_6 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_4 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + X_2 >= 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 For symbol evalfoobb2in: X_5 - X_6 >= 0 /\ -X_4 + X_5 >= 0 /\ -X_3 + X_5 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_4 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + X_2 >= 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 For symbol evalfoobb3in: X_5 - X_6 >= 0 /\ -X_4 + X_5 >= 0 /\ -X_3 + X_5 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_4 >= 0 /\ X_2 - 2 >= 0 /\ X_1 + X_2 - 4 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + X_2 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 2 >= 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 For symbol evalfoobb4in: X_5 - X_6 >= 0 /\ -X_4 + X_5 >= 0 /\ -X_3 + X_5 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_4 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + X_2 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + 1 >= 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 For symbol evalfoobb5in: X_5 - X_6 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_6 - 1 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ X_3 - X_4 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + X_2 >= 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 This yielded the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 6: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] with all transitions in problem 6, the following new transition is obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 7: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transition from problem 7: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 8: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 ] with all transitions in problem 8, the following new transition is obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 9: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 2) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 ] with all transitions in problem 9, the following new transition is obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 10: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 2) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transition from problem 10: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 11: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 ] with all transitions in problem 11, the following new transition is obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 12: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 2) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transition from problem 12: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 13: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 2) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 ] with all transitions in problem 13, the following new transition is obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 14: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 2) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transition from problem 14: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 15: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 2) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] with all transitions in problem 15, the following new transition is obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 16: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 2) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 2) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transition from problem 16: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 17: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 2) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 2) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 By chaining the transition evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 ] with all transitions in problem 17, the following new transitions are obtained: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 18: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 4) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 2) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 18 produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 19: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 4) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 2) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 A polynomial rank function with 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoostop) = 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(koat_start) = 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 orients all transitions weakly and the transition 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 20: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 4) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ?, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 2) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 A polynomial rank function with 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = -V_3 + V_5 + 1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 and size complexities 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-0) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-2) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-4) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-5) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ]", 0-0) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ]", 0-2) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ]", 0-4) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ]", 0-5) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ]", 0-0) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ]", 0-2) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ]", 0-4) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ]", 0-5) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 >= 2 /\\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ]", 0-0) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 >= 2 /\\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 >= 2 /\\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ]", 0-2) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 >= 2 /\\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 >= 2 /\\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ]", 0-4) = 2*ar_1 + ar_5 + ar_1^2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 >= 2 /\\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ]", 0-5) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ]", 0-0) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ]", 0-2) = ? 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ]", 0-4) = ar_5 + 2*ar_1 + ar_1^2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ]", 0-5) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ]", 0-0) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ]", 0-2) = ? 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ]", 0-4) = ar_5 + 2*ar_1 + ar_1^2 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 S("evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\\ 1 >= ar_0 /\\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ]", 0-5) = ar_5 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 orients the transitions 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 weakly and the transition 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 21: T: 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 4) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 + 1 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1*ar_3 + 3*ar_1^2 + ar_1*ar_5 + ar_1^3 + 2*ar_3 + 3*ar_1 + 2*ar_5 + 2, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2 + 1, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ 1 >= ar_0 /\ -ar_0 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: ar_1 + 1, Cost: 3) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0 - 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4 + ar_0 - 1, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_3 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + ar_4 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2 /\ ar_1 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_0 + ar_1 - 4 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 2 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 + 1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 + ar_0 - 1 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 2, Cost: 2) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 >= ar_4 + 1 /\ ar_2 - ar_5 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_4 - 1 >= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ ar_2 - ar_3 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + ar_1 >= 0 /\ ar_4 >= ar_2 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (Comp: 1, Cost: 2) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 start location: koat_start 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 leaf cost: 0 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Complexity upper bound 3*ar_1*ar_3 + 9*ar_1^2 + 3*ar_1*ar_5 + 3*ar_1^3 + 6*ar_3 + 12*ar_1 + 6*ar_5 + 20 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 Time: 1.080 sec (SMT: 0.872 sec) 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 ---------------------------------------- 3.29/2.37 3.29/2.37 (2) 3.29/2.37 BOUNDS(1, n^3) 3.29/2.40 EOF