2.24/1.64	MAYBE
2.64/1.65	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files/bench.koat
2.64/1.65	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	(0) CpxIntTrs
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	----------------------------------------
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	(0)
2.64/1.65	Obligation:
2.64/1.65	Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_start(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_i, v_j, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.0 < v_.01
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.0 > v_.01
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j)) :|: v_.0 >= v_.01 && v_.0 <= v_.01
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0 - 1, v_.01 + 1, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.65	eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.0, v_.01, v_i, v_j)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.65	The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_4]
2.64/1.65	
2.64/1.66	EOF