2.89/1.88	MAYBE
2.89/1.89	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat
2.89/1.89	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	(0) CpxIntTrs
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	----------------------------------------
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	(0)
2.89/1.89	Obligation:
2.89/1.89	Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_start(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_x, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: 2 * v_y >= v_z
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: 2 * v_y < v_z
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_.0 >= 0 && v_z >= 1 && v_z <= 1
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_.0 < 0
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_z < 1
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_z > 1
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0 - 2 * v_y + 1, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE
2.89/1.89	eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.0, v_x, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.89	The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_4]
2.89/1.89	
2.89/1.93	EOF