2.54/1.74 WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) 2.54/1.75 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files/bench.koat 2.54/1.75 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (0) CpxIntTrs 2.54/1.75 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 481 ms] 2.54/1.75 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^1) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 ---------------------------------------- 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (0) 2.54/1.75 Obligation: 2.54/1.75 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_start(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: TRUE 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_x, v_oldx, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: TRUE 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: v_.0 > 0 && v_.0 < 100 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_.critedge_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: v_.0 <= 0 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_.critedge_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: v_.0 >= 100 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: v_.0 >= 2 * v_.01 + 10 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_.critedge_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: v_.0 < 2 * v_.01 + 10 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_3(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: TRUE 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_3(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_2(eval___VERIFIER_nondet_int_start(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x), eval_foo_4(v_.0, v_.01, nondef.0, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: TRUE 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_4(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_5, v_.0, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: TRUE 2.54/1.75 eval_foo_.critedge_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.0, v_.01, v_5, v_oldx, v_x)) :|: TRUE 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_5] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 ---------------------------------------- 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 2.54/1.75 YES(?, 84*ar_3 + 8257) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 Initial complexity problem: 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 1: T: 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 1 /\ 99 >= ar_0 ] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 start location: koat_start 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 leaf cost: 0 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 2.54/1.75 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2: T: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 1 /\ 99 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 start location: koat_start 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 leaf cost: 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 A polynomial rank function with 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoostart) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoocritedgein) = 1 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo3) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo30) = 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart) = 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo31) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo4) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoostop) = 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(koat_start) = 2 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 strictly and produces the following problem: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 3: T: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 1 /\ 99 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 start location: koat_start 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 leaf cost: 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Applied AI with 'oct' on problem 3 to obtain the following invariants: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 For symbol evalfoo3: -X_3 + 44 >= 0 /\ X_1 - X_3 + 43 >= 0 /\ -X_1 - X_3 + 143 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + 99 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 1 >= 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 For symbol evalfoo30: -X_3 + 44 >= 0 /\ X_1 - X_3 + 43 >= 0 /\ -X_1 - X_3 + 143 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + 99 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 1 >= 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 For symbol evalfoo31: -X_3 + 44 >= 0 /\ X_1 - X_3 + 43 >= 0 /\ -X_1 - X_3 + 143 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + 99 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 1 >= 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 For symbol evalfoo4: X_5 - X_6 >= 0 /\ -X_5 + X_6 >= 0 /\ -X_3 + 44 >= 0 /\ X_1 - X_3 + 43 >= 0 /\ -X_1 - X_3 + 143 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + 99 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 1 >= 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 For symbol evalfoobb2in: -X_1 + 99 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 1 >= 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 For symbol evalfoobb3in: -X_3 + 44 >= 0 /\ X_1 - X_3 + 43 >= 0 /\ -X_1 - X_3 + 143 >= 0 /\ -X_1 + 99 >= 0 /\ X_1 - 1 >= 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 This yielded the following problem: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 4: T: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_4 + ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 1 /\ 99 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 start location: koat_start 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 leaf cost: 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 A polynomial rank function with 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(koat_start) = -12*V_4 + 1178 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoostart) = -12*V_4 + 1178 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoocritedgein) = -12*V_3 + 1178 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoostop) = -12*V_3 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo4) = -12*V_1 + 1189 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = -12*V_3 + 1178 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo3) = -6*V_1 + 1216 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo30) = 11 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoo31) = -12*V_1 + 1200 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart) = 10 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = -6*V_1 + 1227 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = -12*V_3 + 1178 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = -12*V_4 + 1178 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_4 + ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 strictly and produces the following problem: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 5: T: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_4 + ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 1 /\ 99 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 start location: koat_start 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 leaf cost: 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 5 produces the following problem: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 6: T: 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_0, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_4 - ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_4 + ar_5 >= 0 /\ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_2(evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g), evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, g)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo31(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo4(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_5, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoo30(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalVERIFIERnondetintstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoo3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_2 + 44 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - ar_2 + 43 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 - ar_2 + 143 >= 0 /\ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ 2*ar_2 + 9 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1178, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ -ar_0 + 99 >= 0 /\ ar_0 - 1 >= 0 /\ ar_0 >= 2*ar_2 + 10 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoocritedgein(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 12*ar_3 + 1179, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= 1 /\ 99 >= ar_0 ] 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 start location: koat_start 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 leaf cost: 0 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Complexity upper bound 84*ar_3 + 8257 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 Time: 0.464 sec (SMT: 0.371 sec) 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 ---------------------------------------- 2.64/1.75 2.64/1.75 (2) 2.64/1.75 BOUNDS(1, n^1) 2.64/1.79 EOF